Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 119-124

  Kin, Kenrick ^a   Agrawala, Maneesh ^a   DeRose, Tony ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bimanual input; Direct touch input; Mouse; Multifinger input; Multitarget selection; Multitouch

Indexed keywords

BI-MANUAL INTERACTION; DESIGN GUIDELINES; MULTI-TOUCH; MULTIFINGERS; MULTIPLE TARGETS; MULTITARGET; NUMBER OF FINGERS; USER STUDY;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 70450078436     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. R. Balakrishnan and K. Hinckley. The role of kinesthetic reference frames in two-handed input performance. In Proc. UIST 1999, pages 171-178, 1999.
2. R. Balakrishnan and K. Hinckley. Symmetric bimanual interaction. In Proc. CHI 2000, pages 33-40, 2000.
3. W. Barnert. A comparison of one-handed and two-handed direct and indirect computer interaction. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, Mass., 11 2005.
4. H. Benko, A. Wilson, and P. Baudisch. Precise selection techniques for multitouch screens. In Proc. CHI 2006, pages 1263-1272, 2006.
5. E. Bier, M. Stone, K. Pier, W. Buxton, and T. DeRose. Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In Proc. Computer Graphics and Interactive Technique, pages 73-80, 1993.
6. W. Buxton and B. Myers. A study in two handed input. In Proc. CHI 1986, pages 321-326, 1986.
7. D. Casalta, Y. Guiard, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Evaluating two-handed input techniques: rectangle editing and navigation. In CHI 1999 (Extended Abstracts), pages 236-237, 1999.
8. J. Diedrichsen, E. Hazeltine, S. Kennerley, and R. B. Ivry. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6):493-498, 2001.
9. R. F. Dillon, J. D. Edey, and J. W. Tombaugh. Measuring the true cost of command selection: Techniques and results. In Proc. CHI 1990, pages 19-25, 1990.
10. C. Forlines, D. Wigdor, C. Shen, and R. Balakrishnan. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 647-656, 1997.
11. Y. Guiard. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a mode. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4):486-517, 1987.
12. Y Guiard and T. Ferrand. Asymmetry in bimanual skills. In Manual asymmetries in motor performance, CRC Press., 1995.
13. J. Han. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proc. VIST 2005, pages 115-118, 2005.
14. M. Hancock, S. Carpendale, and A. Cockburn. Shallow depth 3d interaction: Design and evaluation of one-, two-, and three-touch techniques. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 1147-1156, 2007.
15. K. Hinckley, M. Czerwinski, and M. Sinclair. Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input. In Proc. UIST 1998, pages 49-58, 1998.
16. K. Hinckley, R. Pausch, D. Proffitt, and N. Kassell. Two-handed virtual manipulation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(3):260-302, 1998.
17. K. Hinckley, R. Pausch, D. Proffitt, J. Patten, and N. Kassell. Cooperative bimanual action. In Proc. CHI 1997, pages 27-34, 1997.
18. P. Kabbash, W. Buxton, and A. Sellen. Two-handed input in a compound task. In Proc. CHI 1994, pages 417-423, 1994.
19. J. Karat, J. McDonald, and M. Anderson. A comparison of selection techniques: touch panel, mouse keyboard. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25(1):73-92, 1986.
20. J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(2):229-238, 1979.
21. J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 203 (4384):1029-1031, 1979.
22. C. Latulipe, C. Kaplan, and C. Clarke. Bimanual and unimanual image alignment: an evaluation of mouse-based techniques. In Proc. UIST 2005, pages 123-131, 2005.
23. C. Latulipe, S. Mann, C. Kaplan, and C. Clarke. Symspline: Symmetric two-handed spline manipulation. In Proc. CHI 2006, pages 349-358, 2006.
24. MERL - DiamondTouch. http://www.merl.com/projects/DiamondTouch/.
25. Microsoft Surface. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/index.html.
26. M. Morris. Supporting effective interaction with tabletop groupware. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2006.
27. T. Moscovich and J. Hughes. Indirect mappings of multi-touch input using one and two hands. InProc. CHI 2008, pages 1275-1283, 2008.
28. D. Ostroff and B. Schneiderman. Selection devices for users of an electronic encyclopedia: An empirical comparison of four possibilities. Information Processing and Management, 24(6):665-680, 1988.
29. R. Owen, G. Kurtenbach, G. Fitzmaurice, T. Baudel, and W. Buxton. When it gets more difficult, use both hands: exploring bimanual curve manipulation. In Graphics Interface Conference, pages 17-24, 2005.
30. Perceptive Pixel. http://www.perceptivepixel.com/.
31. J. Rekimoto. Smartskin: An infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proc. CHI 2002, pages 113-120, 2002.
32. S. D. Scott, K. D. Grant, and R. L. Mandryk. System guidelines for colocated, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 159-178, 2003.
33. A. Sears and B. Shneiderman. High precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(4):593-613, 1991.
34. M. Wu and R. Balakrishnan. Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In Proc. UIST 2003, pages 193-202, 2003.