Automating test case definition using a domain specific language

Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX, ACM-SE 46

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 180-185

  Im, Kyungsoo ^a   Im, Tacksoo ^a   McGregor, John D ^a  

^a AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain specific language; Ontology; Software product line; Software testing

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL RESOURCES; DOMAIN EXPERTISE; DOMAIN EXPERTS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGE; DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; FORMAL SPECIFICATION LANGUAGE; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; MODEL-DRIVEN; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SYSTEM TEST; TEST CASE; TEST DESIGNS; USE CASE MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DSL; LINGUISTICS; MODEMS; ONTOLOGY; QUERY LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE TESTING; SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION; TELECOMMUNICATION LINES;

TESTING;

EID: 70450054933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1593105.1593152     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. D. L. Atkins, T. Ball, G. Bruns, and K. Cox. Mawl: a domain-specific language for form-based services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(3):334-346, 1999.
2. F. Basanieri, A. Bertolino, and E. Marchetti. The Cow Suite approach to planning and deriving test suites in UML projects. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 2460, 2002.
3. B. Beizer. Black-Box Testing: Techniques for Functional Testing of Software and Systems. Wiley, 1995.
4. A. Bertolino and S. Gnesi. Use case-based testing of product lines. In Proceedings of the 9th European software engineering conference, pages 355-358, September 2003.
5. R. V. Binder. Testing Object-oriented Systems: Models, Tools, and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
6. L. C. Briand and Y. Labiche. A UML-based approach to system testing. Software and System Modeling, 1(1):10-42, 2002.
7. P. Clements and L. M. Northrop. Software Product Lines : Practices and Patterns. Professional. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
8. P. Fröhlich and J. Link. Automated Test Case Generation from Dynamic Models. In Proceedings of ECOOP 2000-object-oriented programming: 14th European Conference, 2000.
9. E. Kamsties, K. Pohl, S. Reis, and A. Reuys. Testing variabilities in use case models. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-5), November 2003.
10. Linguistic Computing Laboratory. http://lcl2.uniroma1.it/termextractor/ index.jsp, 2007.
11. M. Lange. It's testing time! patterns for testing software. In Proceedings of EuroPLOP01, 2001.
12. B. Marick. http://www.testing.com/test-patterns/patterns/, 2007.
13. J. D. McGregor. Testing a software product line. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2001-TR-022, Software Engineering Institute, 2001.
14. J. D. McGregor. Reasoning about the testability of product line components. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Product Line Testing, 2005.
15. J. D. McGregor. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/ppl, 2007.
16. J. D. McGregor and D. A. Sykes. A Practical Guide to Testing Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
17. M. Mernik, J. Heering, and A. M. Sloane. When and how to develop domain-specific languages. CSURV: Computing Surveys, 37, 2005.
18. C. Nebut, F. Fleurey, Y. Le Traon, and J. M. Jezequel. Automatic test generation: A use case driven approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2006.
19. K. A. Schneider and J. R. Cordy. AUI: a programming language for developing plastic interactive software. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002., pages 3656-3665, 2002.
20. E. G. Sirer and B. N. Bershad. Using production grammars in software testing. In Second Conference on Domain Specific Languages, pages 1-13, 1999.
21. A. van Deursen and P. Klint. Little languages: Little maintenance? Journal of Software Maintenance, 10:75-92, 1998.