Arguing over participatory parity on Nancy Fraser's conception of social justice

Philosophy Today

Volumn 47, Issue SUPPLEMENT, 2003, Pages 176-189

  Zurn, Christopher F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449984612     PISSN: 00318256     EISSN: 00318256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5840/philtoday200347supplement23     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Karl Marx, "For a Ruthless Criticism of Everything Existing [Letter to Arnold Ruge, September 1843]," in The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978), 15
2. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, and Christiane Wilke (New York: Verso, 2003)
3. Christopher F. Zurn, "Identity or Status? Struggles over "Recognition" in Fraser, Honneth, and Taylor," Constellations 10 (2003): 519-37; "Group Balkanization or Societal Homogenization: Is There a Dilemma between Recognition and Distribution Struggles?" Public Affairs Quarterly (forthcoming)
4. Her original construction of a bivalent social theory, in Nancy Fraser, "Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young's Justice and the Politics of Difference" The Journal of Political Philosophy 3, no. 2 (1995): 166-8
5. Axel Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. Joel Anderson (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1995)
6. Charles Taylor, "The Politics of Recognition," in Multiculturalism and "the Politics of Recognition" (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992), 25-73
7. Iris Marion Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990)
8. An elegant argument for the need to extend Fraser's bivalent social theory in the direction of politics, along with a fascinating application of such a trivalent theory to homeless policy in the United States can be found in Leonard C. Feldman, "Redistribution, Recognition, and the State: The Irreducibly Political Dimension of Injustice," Political Theory 30 (2002): 410-40
9. See especially Nancy Fraser, "Rethinking Recognition," New Left Review, no. 3 (2000): 107-20
10. "Recognition without Ethics?" Theory, Culture & Society 18, no. 2-3 (2001): 21-42
11. Nancy Fraser, "Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation," in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, ed. Grethe B. Peterson (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1998), 1-67
12. "Recognition without Ethics?"; Fraser and Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?
13. Fraser and Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?, 36
14. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, revised ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)
15. A sensitive account of the systematic problems of utopian forms of thinking as they plagued the development of Western or Hegelian Marxism, an account that, however, refuses to surrender the promise of utopia ideals, can be found in Seyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986)
16. For Fraser's more detailed consideration of these issues see especially Fraser, "Recognition without Ethics?", 33-38, and Fraser and Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?, 38-42
17. Michael Warner, The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 74
18. See, inter alia, Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978)
19. and Rawls, A Theory of Justice
20. Zurn, "Identity or Status?"