Studio-based learning in CS2: An experience report

Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX, ACM-SE 46

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 253-255

  Myneni, Lakshman ^a   Ross, Margaret ^a   Hendrix, Dean ^a   Narayanan, N Hari ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer science education research; CS2; Peer review; Studio based teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION; COMPUTATIONAL SOLUTIONS; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH; CRITICAL REVIEW; CS2; EVALUATION RESULTS; EXPERIENCE REPORT; INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL; LEARNING ACTIVITY; MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS; PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH; PEER REVIEW; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION; STUDENTS; STUDIOS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 70449969494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1593105.1593171     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Boyer, E. L., and Mitgang, L. D. 1996. Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
2. th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, March 12 - 15, 2008). ACM Press, New York, NY, to appear.
3. Patterson, D. A. 2006. President's letter: Computer science education in the 21st century. Communications of the ACM 49, 3, 27-30.
4. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., and Mc Keachie, W. J. 1991. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
5. Ross, J. 2007. Perhaps the greatest grand challenge: Improving the image of computing. Computing Research News 18, 3, 4.
6. Schon, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.