Technology acceptance: Not all organisations or workers may be the same

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 263-272

  Greenfield, Geoffrey ^a   Rohde, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attitude; Not for profit; Technology acceptance; Volitional control

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449726456     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2009.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adya M., and Kaiser K.M. Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: a model of girls' career choices. Inf Technol People 18 (2005) 230-259
2. Ajzen I. From intention to action: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J., and Beckman J. (Eds). Action control: from cognitions to behaviours (1985), Springer, New York, NY
3. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50 (1991) 179-211
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Social Trends 2003. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Canberra, 2003.
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's welfare 2003 (2003), AIHW, Canberra
6. Benamati J., and Rajkumar T.M. An outsourcing acceptance model: an application of TAM to application development outsourcing decisions. Inf Resour Manage J 21 (2008) 80-102
7. Correll S.T. Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments. Am J Soc 106 (2001) 1691-1730
8. Cunningham B., Nikolai L., and Bazley J. Accounting information for business decisions. 2nd Edition (2004), Thomson, Australia
9. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manage J 34 (1991) 555-590
10. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 13 (1989) 319-339
11. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35 (1989) 36-48
12. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22 (1992) 1111-1132
13. De Lange P., Jackling B., and Gut A. Accounting graduates' perceptions of skills emphasis in undergraduate courses: an investigation from two Victorian universities. Accounting & Finance 46 (2006) 365-386
14. Dettlaff A.J., Moore L.S., and Dietz T.J. Personality type preferences of social work students: enhancing education through understanding personality variables. J Bac Soc Work 11 (2006) 88-101
15. Feldman D.C. The antecedents and consequences of early career indecision among young adults. Hum Resour Manage Rev 13 (2003) 499-531
16. Felton S., Buhr N., and Northey M. Factors influencing the business student's choice of a career in chartered accountancy. Issues Account Educ 9 (1994) 131-142
17. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
18. Gupta U.G., and Houtz L.E. High school students' perceptions of information skills and careers. J Ind Technol 16 (2000) 1-8
19. Hasan B. Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Inf Manage 43 (2006) 565-571
20. Igbaria M., Iivari J., and Maragahh H. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Inf Manage 29 (1995) 227-239
21. Jackling B., and Keneley M. Influences on the supply of accounting graduates in Australia: a focus on international students. Accounting & Finance 49 (2009) 14-159
22. Karahanna E., Ahuja M., Srite M., and Galvin J. Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS. Decis Support Syst 32 4 (2002) 327-341
23. Khalifa M., and Ning Shen K. Explaining the adoption of transactional B2C mobile commerce. J Enterp Info Manag 21 (2008) 110-124
24. Kothandapani V. Validation of feeling, belief, and intention to act as three components of attitude and their contribution to prediction of contraceptive behaviour. J Pers Soc Psychol 19 (1971) 321-333
25. McCoy S., Galletta D., and King W. Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. Eur J Inf Syst 16 (2007) 81-90
26. Saidel J., and Cour S. Information technology and the voluntary sector workplace. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 32 (2003) 5-24
27. Thompson R.L., Higgins C.A., and Howell J.M. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quart 15 (1991) 124-143
28. Venkatesh V., and Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46 (2000) 186-204
29. Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G., and Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 27 (2003) 425-478
30. Voich D. Comparative empirical analysis of cultural values and perceptions of political economy issues (1995), Praeger, Westport, CT
31. Winter S., Chudoba K., and Gutek B. Attitudes toward computers: when do they predict computer use?. Inf Manage 34 (1998) 275-285
32. Yang H., and Yoo Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis Support Syst 38 (2004) 19-31
33. Yi U., Wu Z., and Tung L.L. How individual differences influence technology usage behaviour? Toward an intergrated framework. J Comput Info Syst 46 (2005/2006) 52-63 Winter
34. Yousafzai S., Foxall G., and Pallister J. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. J Model Manag 2 (2007) 251-280