Evaluation of coupled perturbed and density functional methods of computing the parity-violating energy difference between enantiomers

Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 439-457

  MacDermott, A J ^a   Hyde, G O ^b   Cohen, A J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CLEAR LAKE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chirality; DFT; Parity violating energy difference between enantiomers; PVED; PVES

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; NUMERICAL METHOD;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; STEREOISOMERISM; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; STEREOISOMERISM; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 70449715703     PISSN: 01696149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11084-009-9163-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Amos RD et al (1987) Efficient calculation of vibrational magnetic dipole transition moments and rotational strengths. Chem Phys Lett 133: 21-26.
2. Amos RD, Alberts IL, Andrews JS, Colwell SM, Handy NC, Jayatilaka D, Knowles PJ, Kobayashi R, Laming GJ, Lee AM, Maslen PE, Murray, CW Palmierie P, Rice JE, Simandiras ED, Stone AJ, Su MD, Tozer DJ (1998) CADPAC6. 5, The Cambridge analytic derivatives package. Cambridge University Chemical Laboratory, Cambridge.
3. Atkins PW, Friedmann RS (2005) Molecular quantum mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169-171.
4. Bakasov A, Ha T-K, Quack M (1998) Ab initio calculation of molecular energies including parity-violating interactions. J Chem Phys 109: 7263-7285.
5. Bakasov A, Ha T-K, Quack M (1999) Erratum: ab initio calculation of molecular energies including parity-violating interactions. J Chem Phys 110: 6081.
6. Bakasov A, Quack M (1999) Representation of parity-violating potentials in molecular main chiral axes. Chem Phys Lett 303: 547-557.
7. Berger R, Quack M (2000) Multiconfiguration linear response approach to the calculation of parity-violating potentials in polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 112: 3148-3158.
8. Eliel EL, Wilen SH (1994) Stereochemistry of organic compounds. Wiley, New York, p 1210.
9. Handy NC, Cohen AJ (2001) Left-right correlation energy. Mol Phys 99: 403-412.
10. Hamprecht FA, Cohen AJ, Tozer DJ, Handy NC (1998) Development and assessment of new exchange-correlation functionals. J Chem Phys 109: 6264-6271.
11. Hegstrom RA, Rein DW, Sandars PGH (1979) Parity non-conserving energy difference between mirror-image molecules. Phys Lett A 71: 499-502.
12. Hegstrom RA, Rein DW, Sandars PGH (1980) Calculation of the parity non-conserving energy difference between mirror-image molecules. J Chem Phys 73: 2329-2341.
13. Hennum AC, Helgaker T, Klopper W (2002) Parity-violating interaction in H2O2 calculated from density-functional theory. Chem Phys Lett 354: 274-282.
14. Kondepudi DK (1987) Selection of molecular chirality by extremely weak chiral interactions under far from equilibrium conditions. BioSystems 20: 75-83.
15. Laerdahl JK, Schwerdtfeger P (1999) Fully relativistic ab initio calculations of the energies of chiral molecules including parity-violating weak interactions. Phys Rev A 60: 4439-4453.
16. Lazzeretti P, Zanasi R (1997) On the calculation of parity-violating energies in hydrogen peroxide and hydrogen disulphide molecules within the random-phase approximation. Chem Phys Lett 279: 349-354.
17. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37: 785-789.
18. MacDermott AJ (1995) Electroweak enantioselection and the origin of life. Orig Life Evol Biosph 25: 191-199.
19. MacDermott AJ (2000) The ascent of parity-violation: exochirality in the solar system and beyond. Enantiomer 5: 153-168.
20. MacDermott AJ, Hegstrom RA (2004) A proposed experiment to measure the parity-violating energy difference between enantiomers from the optical rotation of chiral ammonia-like "cat" molecules. Chem Phys 305: 55-68.
21. MacDermott AJ, Tranter GE, Trainor SJ (1989) The search for large parity-violating energy differences finds fruit in thiosubstituted DNA analogues. Chem Phys Lett 194: 152-156.
22. Mason SF, Tranter GE (1984) The parity-violating energy difference between enantiomeric molecules. Mol Phys 53: 1091-1111.
23. Mason SF, Tranter GE (1985) The electroweak origin of biomolecular handedness. Proc R Soc Lond A 397: 45-65.
24. Quack M (2002) How Important is parity-violation for molecular and biomolecular chirality? Angew Chem Int Ed 41: 4618-4630.
25. Tranter GE (1985) The parity-violating energy differences between the enantiomers of α-amino acids. Chem Phys Lett 120: 93-96.
26. Tranter GE (1986a) Parity-violating energy differences and the origin of biomolecular homochirality. J Theor Biol 119: 467-479.
27. Tranter GE (1986b) Preferential stabilization of the d-sugar series by the parity-violating weak interactions. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 60-61.
28. Tranter GE, MacDermott AJ et al (1992) Computational studies of the electroweak origin of biomolecular handedness in natural sugars. Proc R Soc Lond A 436: 603-615.
29. Wesendrup R, Laerdahl JK, Compton RN, Schwerdtfeger P (2003) Biomolecular homochirality and electroweak interactions. I. The yamagata hypothesis. J Phys Chem A 107: 6668-6673.
30. Yamagata Y (1966) A hypothesis of the asymmetric appearance of biomolecules on earth. J Theor Biol 11: 495-498.
31. Zanasi R, Lazzeretti P (1998) On the stabilization of natural L-enantiomers of α-amino acids via parity-violating effects. Chem Phys Lett 286: 240-242.
32. Zanasi R, Lazzeretti P et al (1999) Theoretical results which strengthen the hypothesis of electroweak bioenantioselection. Phys Rev E 59: 3382-3385.