Differences in physician and patient ratings of items used to assess hip disorders

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1508-1512

  Martin, Robroy L ^a   Mohtadi, Nicholas G ^b   Safran, Marc R ^c   Leunig, Michael ^d   Martin, Hal D ^e   McCarthy, Joseph ^f   Guanche, Carlos A ^g   Kelly, Bryan T ^h   Byrd, J W Thomas ⁱ   Clohisy, John C ^j   Philippon, Marc J ^k   Sekiya, Jon K ^l  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^e Oklahoma Sports Science and Orthopaedics   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ORTHOPEDIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

ⁱ Nashville Sports Medicine Foundation   (United States)

^j WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k STEADMAN HAWKINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Instrument; Outcome; Patient perspective; Questionnaire; Self report

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP DISEASE; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECREATION; SPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HIP INJURY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HIP INJURIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENTS; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449709850     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546509333851     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
2. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134:889-895.
3. Hambly K, Griva K. IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1695-1704.
4. Martin RL. Hip arthroscopy and outcome assessment. Oper Tech Orthop. 2005;15:290-296.
5. Mohtadi N. Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:350-359.
6. Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, Kirkley A. Knee-specific qualityof-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1450-1458.
7. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:43-49.
8. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairment, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organi - zation; 2001.
9. Zarins B. Are validated questionnaires valid? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1671-1672.