Coronary Revascularization-2009: State of the Art

Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 196-198

  Taggart, David P ^a  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

coronary artery bypass grafting; cost effectiveness; multidisciplinary team; percutaneous coronary intervention; reintervention; survival; syntax

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; STATIN;

ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MORTALITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PATIENT CARE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PROGNOSIS; STROKE; SURGICAL RISK; SURVIVAL;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE TEAM;

EID: 70449706345     PISSN: 10430679     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yusuf S., Zucker D., Peduzzi P., et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: Overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 344 (1994) 563-570
2. Taggart D.P., and Thomas B.F. Lecture. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg 82 (2006) 1966-1975
3. Hoffman S.N., TenBrook J.A., Wolf M.P., et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: One to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003) 1293-1304
4. Bravata D.M., Gienger A.L., McDonald K.M., et al. Systematic review: The comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Intern Med 147 (2007) 703-716
5. Hlatky M.A., Boothroyd D.B., Bravata D.M., et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: A collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomized trials. Lancet (2009) (in press)
6. Taggart D.P. Surgery is the best intervention for severe coronary artery disease. BMJ 330 (2005) 785-786
7. Taggart D.P. Percutaneous or surgical intervention in coronary artery disease. Lancet (2009) (in press)
8. Brener S.J., Lytle B.W., Casserly I.P., et al. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation 109 (2004) 2290-2295
9. Hannan E.L., and Racz M.J. Walford get al Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 2174-2183
10. Malenka D.J., Leavitt B.J., Hearne M.J., et al., Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: Analysis of Bari-like patients in northern New England. Circulation 112 suppl (2005) I371-I376
11. Smith P.K., Califf R.M., Tuttle R.H., et al. Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann Thorac Surg 82 (2006) 1420-1428
12. Bair T.L., Muhlestein J.B., May H.T., et al. Surgical revascularization is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with percutaneous stenting in most subgroups of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Results from the intermountain Heart Registry. Circulation 116 suppl (2007) I226-I231
13. Hannan E.L., Wu C., Walford G., et al. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 358 (2008) 331-341
14. Niles N.W., McGrath P.D., Malenka D., et al., Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Survival of patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization: Results of a large regional prospective study. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 1008-1015
15. Pell J.P., Pell A.C., Jeffrey R.R., et al. Comparison of survival following coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: Retrospective cohort study of 6320 procedures. Diabet Med 21 (2004) 790-792
16. BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the Bari randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 1600-1606
17. Serruys P.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P., et al. The SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360 (2009) 961-972
18. Taggart D.P., D'Amico R., and Altman D.G. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: A systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 358 (2001) 870-875
19. Hannan E.L., Wu C., Smith C.R., et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation 116 (2007) 1145-1152
20. Puskas J.D., Edwards F.H., Pappas P.A., et al. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women and narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 84 (2007) 1447-1454
21. Hannan E.L., Racz M., Holmes D.R., et al. Impact of completeness of percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization on long-term outcomes in the stent era. Circulation 113 (2006) 2406-2412
22. Brophy J.M., Belisle P., and Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 138 (2003) 777-786
23. Stettler C., Wandel S., Allemann S., et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: A collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet 370 (2007) 937-948
24. Hill R., Bagust A., Bakhai A., et al. Coronary artery stents: A rapid systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 8 (2004) 1-242
25. Griffin S.C., Barber J.A., Manca A., et al. Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: Prospective observational study. BMJ 334 (2007) 624-627