Apomediation and the significance of online social networking

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 25-27

  O'Connor, Dan ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; COUNSELING; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COUNSELING; GENETIC TESTING; GENOME, HUMAN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; NEGOTIATING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 70449699958     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902893981     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Eysenbach, G. 2008. Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10(3): e2. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/ 2008/3/e22/ (accessed April 10, 2009).
2. Horblum, A. 1998. Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison. New York, NY: Routledge, xx.
3. Lee, S. S., and Crawley, L. 2009. Research 2.0: Social networking and DTC genomics. American Journal of Bioethics 9(6-7): 35-44.
4. McGuire, A. L., Diaz, C. M., Wang, T., and Hilsenbeck, S. G. 2009. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. American Journal of Bioethics 9(6-7): 3-10.
5. O'Reilly Media, Inc. 2008. Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Available at: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web-20-compact.html (accessed April 10, 2009).