Genetic privacy: Might there be a moral duty to share one's genetic information?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 52-54

  Malm, Heidi ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DUTY TO WARN; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INTERNET; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 70449699953     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902923440     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. de Melo-Martin, I. 2008. A duty to participate in research: Does social context matter? The American Journal of Bioethics 8(10): 28-36.
2. Harris, J. 2005. Scientific research is a moral duty. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 242-248.
3. Lee, S. S., and Crawley, L. 2009. Research 2.0: Social networking and DTC genomics. American Journal of Bioethics 9(6-7): 35-44.
4. Malm, H. 2000. Bad Samaritan laws: Harm, hype or help. Law and Philosophy 19(6): 707-750.
5. Resnik, D. 2009. Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality. American Journal of Bioethics 9(6-7): 45-46.
6. Rhodes, R. Rethinking research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 7-28.
7. Shapshay, S., and Pimple, K. D. 2007. Participation is biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: A response to John Harris. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(7): 414-417.
8. Sharp, R. R., and Yarborough, M. 2005. Additional thought on rethinking research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5(1): 40-42.
9. Smith, P. 1998. Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation. Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.
10. Wasson, K. 2009. Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: Should amore robust informed consent process be included? American Journal of Bioethics 9(6-7): 56-58.