Monitoring dynamic behaviour of a long-span railway bridge

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 419-433

  Wiberg, J ^a   Karoumi, R ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acceleration; Damping; Monitoring; Railway bridge dynamics; Slab track; Traffic induced vibrations

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; BOX GIRDER; BRIDGE DESIGN; CONCRETE STRUCTURES; DAMPING RATIO; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; LIMIT VALUES; LONG SPAN; OUTPUT ONLY; PEAK-PICKING METHOD; PRE-STRESSED; RAILWAY BRIDGE DYNAMIC; RAILWAY BRIDGES; SLAB TRACKS; STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION; STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR; TRAFFIC INDUCED VIBRATIONS; TRAIN PASSAGES;

DAMPING; RAILROAD TRACKS; RAILROADS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

RAILROAD BRIDGES;

EID: 70449672624     PISSN: 15732479     EISSN: 17448980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15732470701478578     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andersen, P., Technical Paper on the Stochastic Subspace Identification Techniques. ARTeMIS Extractor compiled HTML Help file within the ARTeMIS Extractor Pro (release 3.5) environment. Structural Vibration Solutions A/S. 2005.
2. Banverket, The new Arsta bridge: A new railway bridge in Stockholm. Brochure from the Swedish National Railway Administration's (Banverkets) Eastern Track Region. 2003.
3. Brandt, A., 2000. Ljud- och vibrationsanalys I. Saven EduTech AB and Blekinge Tekniska Hogskola, Institutionen for telekommunikation och signalbehandling (In Swedish).
4. Brincker, R., Zhang, L. and Andersen, P., Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), San Antonio,Texas, 2000.
5. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), 2002. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. Final draft, prEN 1991-2.
6. TM SF1500S accelerometer. Available online at: www.colibrys.com/e/page/337 (accessed 5 June 2006).
7. COWI, 2000. Construction document. Drawn by COWI and approved by the Swedish National Railway Administration (Banverket). revision C.
8. De Roeck, G., Peeters, B. and Ren, W.X., Benchmark study on system identification through ambient vibration mea- surements. In Proceedings of IMAC-XVIII, the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, 2000, pp. 1106- 1112.
9. Enckell, M.,Karoumi R. Wiberg J., Structural health monitoring for an optimized pre-stressed concrete bridge. In Proceedings of SHMII-1, The First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelli- gent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, November, 13-15. 2003.
10. Enevoldsen, I., Pedersen, C., Axhag, F., Johansson, O. andToyra, B., 2002. Assessment and measurement of the Forsmo bridge, sweden. Structural Engineering Inter national, 12 (4), 254-257.
11. Gade, S., Møller, N., Herlufsen, H. and Konstantin-Hansen, H., Frequency domain techniques for operational modal analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC),Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
12. Herlufsen, H., Andersen, P., Gade, S. and Møller, N., Identification techniques for operational modal analysis - An overview and practical experiences. In Proceedings of the 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
13. Huth, O., Feltrin, G., Maeck, J., Kilic, N. and Motavalli, M., 2005. Damage identification using modal data: Experiences on a prestressed concrete bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131 (12), 1898-1910.
14. Johnson, R., 1999. Progression of the dynamic properties of large suspension bridges during construction: A case study of the Hoga Kusten bridge. Licentiate thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
15. Karoumi, R., 1998. Response of cable-stayed and suspension bridges to moving vehicles: Analysis methods and practical modeling techniques. PhD thesis. Royal In- stitute of Technology (KTH). Available online at:www.byv.kth.se/publikationer/pdf/raid/Karoumi_PhD_ thesis.pdf
16. Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G., 2001. Stochastic systemidentification for operational modal analysis: A review. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 123 (4),659-667.
17. SOLVIA Engineering AB., 2006. SOLVIA® Finite Element System. Manual, The users' manual to Version 03.
18. UIC (International Union of Railways), UIC Code 776-2 R. Design requirements for rail-bridges based on interction phenomena between train, track, bridge and in particu- lar, speed. 2003.
19. UIC (International Union of Railways), 2006. Guidelines for Railway Bridge Dynamic Measurements and Calculations. Draft UIC leaflet. Version 1.
20. Wiberg, J., 2006. Bridge monitoring to allow for reliable dynamic FE modelling: A case study of the new Arsta railway bridge. Licentiate thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Available online at: www.byv.kth. se/publikationer/pdf/wiberg/LicThesisA4_webb.pdf
21. Yang, Y.B., Yau, J.D. and Wu, Y.S., 2004. Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Dynamics with Applications to High-Speed Railways. Singapore: World Scientific.
22. Yu, D.J. and Ren, W.X., 2005. EMD-based stochastic subspace identification of structures from operational vibration measurements. Engineering Structures, 27 (12), 1741-1751.
23. Zong, Z.H., Jaishi, B., Ge, J.P. and Ren, W.X., 2005. Dynamic analysis of a half-through concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge. Engineering Structures, 27 (1), 3-15.