Determining the optimal collaborative benchmarks in a supply chain

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 4457-4471

  Li, Der Chiang ^a   Dai, Wen Li ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Robust benchmarks; Sensitivity analysis; Supply chain collaboration performance

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE PERFORMANCE; COMPANY PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION; SUPPLY CHAIN SYSTEMS; UNSTABLE SYSTEM;

CHAINS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 70449637523     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540801918588     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
2. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E., 1991. Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 1-15.
3. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., and Stank, T.P., 1991. 21st century logistics: making supply chain integration a reality. Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management.
4. Charnes, A., et al., 1985. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 2, 139-156.
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
6. Charnes, A. and Neralic, L., 1989. Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis. Glasnik Mathematicki, 24, 211-226.
7. Chopra, S. and Meindl, P., 2004. Supply chain management-strategy, planning, and operation. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Edition, Inc.
8. Clossa, D.J. and Mollenkopf, D.A., 2004. A global supply chain framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 37-44.
9. Danese, P., 2006. Collaboration forms, information and communication technologies, and coordination mechanisms in CPFR. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 3207-3226.
10. Gao, C., Huang, X.N., and Sueyoshi, T., 2003. Management performance evaluation: data envelopment analysis. Taipei: Hwatai Company Publishing.
11. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71-79.
12. Li, D.C. and Dai, W.L., 2007. Supply chain performance improvement employing Data Envelopment Analysis and Support Vector Machine Technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007 (submitted).
13. Lu, S.N. and Zhou, K.L., 2004. The first book of supply chain management. Taipei: Business-week Publishing.
14. Lyu, J.J., 2007. Giant-bicycles-design with value innovation in coordination. Taipei: Kung-Hwa Management Cases Collections.
15. Mollenkopf, D.A. and Dapiran, G.P., 1999. World class logistics: how well do Australian/ New Zealand firms perform, Council of Logistics Management Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada.
16. Saccomano, A., 1998. Keeping SCOR. Traffic World, 255, 27-28.
17. Seiford, L.M., 1996. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99-137.
18. Stedman, C., 1998. Users eye standard for supply chain. Computerworld News, June 1.
19. Taylor, D.A., 2004. Supply chains: a manager's guide. 1st ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc, Addison Wesley Professional.
20. Wisner, J.D., Leong, G.K., and Tan, K.C., 2005. Principles of supply chain management: A balanced approach. Singapore: South Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.