Semantic relatedness in folksonomy

Proceedings - 2009 International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science, NISS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 760-765

  Wu, Chao ^a   Zhou, Bo ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Folksonomy; Semantic similarity; Tags

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE COGNITION; COLLABORATIVE TAGGING; FOLKSONOMIES; FOLKSONOMY; SEMANTIC RELATEDNESS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SHARED RESOURCES; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; TAGGING SYSTEMS; TAGS; YOUTUBE;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 70449602997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NISS.2009.150     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Wu, X., L. Zhang, and Y. Yu, Exploring social annotations for the semantic web, in Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. 2006, ACM: Edinburgh, Scotland.
2. Chirita, P.-A., et al., P-TAG: large scale automatic generation of personalized annotation tags for the web, in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 2007, ACM: Banff, Alberta, Canada.
3. Cimiano, P., S. Handschuh, and S. Staab, Towards the selfannotating web, in Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. 2004, ACM: New York, NY, USA.
4. Brooks, C.H. and Montanez, N., Improved Annotation of the Blogosphere via Autotagging and Hierarchical Clustering. WWW 2006, May 23-26, 2006, Edinburgh, UK.
5. T Gruber, Ontology of folksonomy: A mash-up of apples and oranges, International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, Vol.3, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 1-11.
6. Dill, S., et al., SemTag and seeker: bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation, in Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web. 2003, ACM: Budapest, Hungary.
7. Shaw, B., Semidefinite Embedding Applied to Visualizing Folksonomies. Project Proposal. December, 2005.
8. Saltón, G.; McGill, M.J, Modern information retrieval. New York, McGraw Hill, 1983.
9. Kuo, B.Y.-L., et al., Tag clouds for summarizing web search results, in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 2007, ACM: Banff, Alberta, Canada.
10. Hassan-Montero, Y. and V. Herrero-Solana, Improving TagClouds as Visual Information Retrieval Interfaces, in I International Conference on Multidisciplinary Information Sciences and Technologies, InSciT2006.2006: Merida, Spain.
11. Mathes, A., Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, 2004.
12. Mika, P., Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005), LNCS 3729, SpringerVerlag, 2005.
13. Agrawal, R., et al., Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases, in Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 1993, ACM: Washington, D.C., United States.
14. Shaw, B., Utilizing Folksonomy: Similarity Metadata from the Del.icio.us System. Project Proposal. December, 2005.
15. Szomszor, M., et al., Folksonomies, the Semantic Web, and Movie Recommendation, in 4th European Semantic Web Conference. 2007: Innsbruck, Austria.
16. Agrawal, R. and R. Srikant, Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 1994, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
17. Hammond, T., et al., Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review, in D-Lib Magazine. 2005.
18. Nickles, M., T. Froehner, and G. Wei?, Social Annotation of Semantically Heterogeneous Knowledge, in SemAnnot. 2004.
19. Golder, et al., The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. 2005.
20. Li, R., et al., Towards effective browsing of large scale social annotations, in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 2007, ACM: Banff, Alberta, Canada.
21. Golder, S.A. and B.A. Huberman, Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 2006. 32(2): p. 198-208.
22. Arrington, M. Exclusive: Screen shots and feature overview of Delicious 2.0 preview. 2007; Available from: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/ exclusive-screen-shotsand-feature-overview-of-delicious-20-preview/.
23. Salonen, J., Self-organising map based tag clouds - Creating spatially meaninful representations of tagging data, in Proceedings of 1st OPAALS workshop, 2007. 2007.
24. Lee, S.H., P.-J. Kim, and H. Jeong, Statistical properties of sampled networks. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics), 2006. 73(1): p. 016102-16107
25. Russell, T., cloudalicious: folksonomy over time, in Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. 2006, ACM: Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
26. Morris, J. and G. Hirst, Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Comput. Linguist, 1991. 17(1): p. 21-48.
27. Resnik, P., Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy, in Proceeding of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1995: Montreal, p. 448-453.
28. Maguitman, A.G., et al., Algorithmic detection of semantic similarity, in Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. 2005, ACM: Chiba, Japan.
29. Jarmasz, M. and S. Szpakowicz, Roget's Thesaurus and Semantic Similarity, in Proceedings of Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2003). 2003: Borovets, Bulgaria, p. 212-219.
30. Turney, P., Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL, in Machine Learning: ECML 2001. 2001. p. 491-502. (Pubitemid 33331094)
31. Cilibrasi, R. and P. Vitanyi, Similarity of Objects and the Meaning of Words, in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. 2006. p. 21-45.
32. A. Farahat, P Pirolli, and P Markova, Incremental Methods for Computing Word Pair Similarity. 2004, Tech. Rep. No. TR-04-6-2004.