Innovation and spatial knowledge spillovers: Evidence from Brazilian patent data;Innovation et retombées de la connaissance spatiale: Preuves de données de brevets au Brésil

Regional Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 513-528

  Gonçalves, Eduardo ^a   Almeida, Eduardo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Patents; Regional technological change; Spatial knowledge spillovers

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INNOVATION; MODELING; REGIONAL POLICY; SPILLOVER EFFECT; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 70449602141     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701874131     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ACS Z. J., ANSELIN L. and VARGA A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31, 1069-1085.
2. ALBUQUERQUE E. M. (2000) Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980- 1995), Research Policy 29, 1047-1060.
3. ALBUQUERQUE E. M., BAESSA A. and SILVA L. (2005) A atividade de patenteamento no Brasil e no Exterior, in Indicadores deciência, tecnologia e inovação em São Paulo - 2004, pp. 6.1-6.37. FAPESP, São Paulo.
4. ALBUQUERQUE E. M., SIMO ̃ES R., BAESSA A., CAMPOLINA B. and SILVA L. (2002) A distribuição espacial da produção científica e tecnolo ́gica brasileira: uma descrição de estatísticas de produção local de patentes e artigos científicos, Revista Brasileira de Inovação 1, 225-251.
5. ANSELIN L. (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
6. ANSELIN L. (1992) SpaceStat Tutorial: A Workbook for Using Spacestat in the Analysis of Spatial Data. University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign, IL.
7. ANSELIN L. (1999) Spatial Econometrics. School of Social Science, University of Texas, Dallas, TX.
8. AUDRETSCH D. B. (1998) Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, 18-29
9. AUDRETSCH D. B. and FELDMAN M. P. (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review 86, 630-640.
10. AW B. Y. and PALANGKARAYA A. (2004) Local Knowledge Spillovers in the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry. Working Paper No. 18/04. Melbourne Institute, Melbourne.
11. BRESCHI S. and LISSONI F. (2000) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Paper presented at the 40th European Regional Science Association Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 29 August-2 September 2000.
12. CAPELO R., FAGGIAN A. and VERONELLI D. V. (2001) Milan: dynamic urbanisation economies vs. milieu economies, in SIMMIE J. (Ed.) Innovative Cities, pp. 97-128. E&FN Spon, New York, NY.
13. CARLINO G., CHATTERJEE S. and HUNT R. (2001) Knowledge Spillovers and the New Economy of Cities. Working Paper No. 01-14. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
14. CHRISTALLER W. (1966) Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
15. COHEN W. and KLEPPER S. (1996) A reprise of size and R&D, Economic Journal 106, 925-951.
16. DE NEGRI J. A. and SALERMO M. S. (2005) Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. IPEA, Brasília.
17. DINIZ C. C. (1993) Desenvolvimento poligonal no Brasil: nem desconcentração nem contínua polarização, Nova Economia 3, 35-64.
18. DINIZ C. C. (1994) Polygonized development in Brazil: neither decentralization no continued polarization, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18, 293-314.
19. DINIZ C. C. (1999) A nova configuração urbano-industrial no Brasil, in Encontro Nacional de Economia, 27, Belém. ANPEC, Anais Belém.
20. DINIZ C. C. and GONÇALVES E. (2001) Knowledge Economy and Regional Development in Brazil. Paper presented at the Les Troisièmes Journées de la Proximité - The Third Congress on Proximity, Paris, France.
21. FELDMAN M. P. (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8, 5-25.
22. FELDMAN M. P. and AUDRETSCH D. B. (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized compe- tition, European Economic Review 43, 409-429.
23. FELDMAN M. P. and FLORIDA R. (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product inno- vation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, 210-229.
24. FISCHER M. M. and VARGA A. (2003) Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: evidence from Austria, Annals of Regional Science 37, 303-322.
25. FLORAX R. J. G. M., FOLMER H. and REY S. J. (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33, 557-579.
26. FRANSMAN M. (1985) Conceptualising technical change in the Third World in the 1980s: an interpretive survey, Journal of Devel- opment Studies 21, 572-652.
27. GLAESER E. L., KALLAL H. D., SCHEINKMAN J. A. and SHLEIFER A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126-1152.
28. GONÇALVES E. (2005) A distribuição espacial da atividade inovadora brasileira: uma análise exploratória. Discussion Paper No. 246. CEDEPLAR, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
29. GONÇALVES E. (2006) Estrutura urbana e atividade tecnolo ́gica em Minas Gerais, Economia Aplicada 10, 481-502.
30. GRILICHES Z. (1979) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661-1707.
31. HARRISON B., KELLEY M. R. and GANT J. (1996) Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change. Economic Geography 72, 233-258.
32. HIRSCH-KREINSEN H., JACOBSON D., LAESTADIUS S. and SMITH K. (2003) Low-Tech Industries and the Knowledge Economy: State of the Art and Research Challenges. Project 'Pilot: Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech' (available at: http://www.step.no/reports/Y2003/1603.pdf).
33. IBGE (2002) Pesquisa industrial - inovação tecnológica 2000. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
34. IPEA (2004) Dados sobre educação - 2000 (available at: http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ipeaweb.dll/ipeadata?152307203) (accessed 10 December 2004).
35. JACOBS J. (1969) The Economy of Cities, Random House, New York, NY.
36. JAFFE A. B. (1989) Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review 79, 957-970.
37. JAFFE A., TRAJTENBERG M. and HENDERSON R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 577-598.
38. KRUGMAN P. (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483-499.
39. LEMOS M. B., MORO S., DOMINGUES E. P. and RUIZ R. M. (2005a) Espaços preferenciais e aglomerações industriais, in NEGRI J. A. and SALERMO M. (Eds) Inovação, Padrões Tecnológicos e Desempenho das Firmas Industriais Brasileiras. IPEA, Brasília.
40. LEMOS M. B., MORO S., DOMINGUES E. P. and RUIZ R. M. (2005b) A organização territorial da indústria no Brasil, in NEGRI J. A. and SALERMO M. (Eds) Inovação, Padrões Tecnológicos e Desempenho das Firmas Industriais Brasileiras. IPEA, Brasília.
41. LEVIN R., KLEVORICK A. K., NELSON R. and WINTER S. G. (1987) Appropriating the returns to industrial R&D, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783-831.
42. MALECKI E. J. (1987) The R&D location decision of the firm and creative regions, Technovation 6, 205-222.
43. MALECKI E. J. (1997) Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Change. Longman, New York, NY.
44. MORENO-SERRANO R., PACI R. and USAI S. (2004) Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions. Working Paper No. 03-10. Centro Riserche Economiche Nord Sud. Università di Cagliari and Università di Sassari, Cagliari.
45. PORTER M. E. (1989) A vantagem competitiva das nações. Campus, Rio de Janeiro.
46. RAPINI M. S. (2005) Interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: evidências do diretório dos grupos de pesquisa do CNPQ. Discussion Paper No. 251. CEDEPLAR, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
47. SANTOS F., CROCCO M. and JAYME JÚNIOR F. G. (2006) Knowledge externalities and growth in peripheral regions, in ARESTIS P., BADDELEY M. and MCCOMBIE J. (Eds) Economic Growth: New Directions in Theory and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
48. SCHERER F. M. (1983) The propensity to patent, International Journal of Industrial Organization 1, 107-128.
49. SIMMIE J. (2001) Innovation and agglomeration theory, in SIMMIE J. (Ed.) Innovative Cities, pp. 11-52. E&FN Spon, New York, NY.
50. VARGA A. (1998) University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers. Kluwer, Boston, MA.
51. WOOD P. (2001) Conclusions: innovative cities in Europe, in SIMMIE J. (Ed.) Innovative Cities, pp. 231-247. E&FN Spon, New York, NY.