|
Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 3-10
|
Why consent may not be needed for organ procurement
|
Author keywords
Autonomy of the dead; Body as property; Conscription; Consent; Organ procurement; Posthumous harm
|
Indexed keywords
ART;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
AUTOPSY;
CADAVER;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MORALITY;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
POLICY;
PUBLIC OPINION;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
TRANSPLANTATION;
UNITED STATES;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
AUTOPSY;
CADAVER;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
HUMAN BODY;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
OWNERSHIP;
PUBLIC OPINION;
PUBLIC POLICY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;
TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 70449598148
PISSN: 15265161
EISSN: 15360075
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902985019 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (31)
|
References (12)
|