Differentiating gender discrimination and sexist behavior: An examination of antecedents and outcomes

Military Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 299-314

  Nye, Christopher D ^a   Brummel, Bradley J ^b   Drasgow, Fritz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449586885     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08995600902914388     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. 2002 Status of the Armed Forces Survey-Workplace and gender relations [Data file and documentation on CD-ROM]. (2003). Arlington, VA: United States Defense Manpower Data Center.
2. Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425-437.
3. Bergman, M. E., Day Langhout, R., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 230-242.
4. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling in LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Hunter Williams, J., & Day Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64-80.
6. DiTomaso, N. (1989). Sexuality in the workplace: Discrimination and harassment. In J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. T. Sheriff, & G. Burrell (Eds.), The sexuality of the organization (pp. 71-90). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Donovan, M., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Do men's and women's experiences of sexual harassment differ? An examination of the differential test functioning of the sexual experiences questionnaire. Military Psychology, 11, 265-282.
8. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
9. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., & Magley, V. J. (1999). Sexual harassment in the armed forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11, 329-343.
10. Fitzgerald, L. F., Magley, V. J., Drasgow, F., & Waldo, C. R. (1999). Measuring sexual harassment in the military: The sexual experiences questionnaire (SEQ-DoD). Military Psychology, 11, 329-343.
11. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
12. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118.
13. Glomb, T. M., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486-496.
14. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488.
15. Heckman, J., & Siegelman, P. (1993). The urban institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In M. Fix & R. Stuyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America (pp. 187-258). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6, 1-55.
17. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Sofware International.
18. Lubbers, R., Loughlin, C., & Zweig, D. (2005). Young workers' job self-efficacy and affect: Pathways to health and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 199-214.
19. Mazzeo, S. E., Bergman, M. E., Buchanan, N. T., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2001). Situation-specific assessment of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 120-131.
20. Ormerod, A. J., Lawson, A. K., Sims, C. S., Lytell, M. C., Wadlington, P. L., Yaeger, D. W., et al. (2003). 2002 Status of the Armed Forces Survey-Workplace and gender relations: Report on scales and measures (DMDC Rep. No. 2002-031). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Work Experiences Lab.
21. Willis, E. J., Mohamed, S. G., & Lipari, R. N. (2002). 2002 Status of the Armed Forces Survey-Workplace and gender relations: Administration, datasets, and codebook (Report No. 2002-010). Arlington, VA: United States Defense Manpower Data Center.