A descriptive social neuroethics is needed to reveal lived identities

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 16-17

  Fry, Craig L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; NEUROSCIENCE; POLITICS; SELF CONCEPT;

HUMANS; NEUROSCIENCES; POLITICS; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 70449585433     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903098580     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Academy of Medical Sciences. 2008. Brain Science, Addiction and Drugs. London, UK: Academy of Medical Sciences.
2. Fox, N. J., and Ward, K. J. 2008. What are health identities and how may we study them? Social Health Illustration 30(7): 1007-1021.
3. Fry, C. 2008. A social neuroethics of addiction: Revealing public and private identities and self understanding. Neuroethics Society First Annual Meeting, Washington, USA. American Journal of Bioethics 9(1): 57-58.
4. Gillett, G. R. 2009. The subjective brain, identity, and neuroethics. American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience 9(9): 5-13.
5. Gottweis, H. 2008. Participation and the new governance of life. BioSocieties 3: 265-286.
6. Illes, J. 2006. Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Illes, J., Lombera, S., Rosenberg, J., and Arnow, B. 2008. Inthemind's eye: Provider and patient attitudes to functional brain imaging. Journal Psychiatric Research 43(2): 107-114.
8. Keane, H. 2002. What's Wrong With Addiction? Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press, Carlton South.
9. Levy, N. 2007. Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.