NURBS representation of estimated surfaces resulting from machining errors

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 395-410

  Barari, A ^a   Elmaraghy, H A ^b   Orban, P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error compensation; Kinematic error model; Machine tool configuration; Quasi static errors; Simulation of machining errors; Virtual machining

Indexed keywords

DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY; ERROR COMPENSATION; ESTIMATION; GEOMETRY; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; MACHINING; MACHINING CENTERS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; SIMULATION PLATFORM; TOPOLOGY; VECTOR SPACES;

KINEMATIC ERROR; MACHINED SURFACE; MACHINING PROCESS; MANUFACTURING PLATFORMS; MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATIONS; QUASI-STATIC; SIMULATION OF MACHINING; VIRTUAL MACHINING;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 70449585288     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09511920802392730     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1993. ANSI/ ASME B5.54, Methods for performing evaluation of computer numerically controlled machining centers. New York: ASME.
2. Barari, A., 2006. Conformance to tolerance by closed-loop machining and inspection. Thesis (PhD). University of Western Ontario.
3. Barari, A., et al., 2004. Integrated inspection and machining approach to machining error compensation; advantages and limitations. In: 14 the Conference of Flexible Automation & Intelligent Manufacturing, Toronto, Canada, 563-572.
4. Hocken, R.J., 1980. Technology of Machine Tools. Machine Tool Accuracy, UCRL 752960- Supp. 5, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, CA.
5. Huh, I., Yuan, J., and Koren, Y., 1999. Systematic machine tool error identification and compensation through test part. American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Publication) DSC, 67 (1), 915-925.
6. Jung, J.H., Choi, J.P., and Lee, S.J., 2006. Machining accuracy enhancement by compensating for volumetric errors of a machine tool and on-machine measurement. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 174 (1), 56-66.
7. Lin, Y. and Shen, Y., 1999. Generic kinematic error modeling for machine tool metrology. International Journal of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing, 7 (3-4), 305-320.
8. Lin, Y. and Shen, Y., 2003. Modeling of five-axis machine tool metrology models using the matrix summation approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21 (1), 243-248.
9. Mou, J. and Liu, C.R., 1992. A method for enhancing the accuracy of CNC machine tools for on-machine inspection. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 11 (14), 229-237.
10. Mou, J. and Liu, C.R., 1995. A methodology for machine tools error correction using reference parts. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 8 (1), 64-77.
11. Newman, D.J., 1998. Analytic Number Theory. New York: Springer.
12. Okafor, A.C. and Ertekin, Y.M., 2000. Derivation of machine tool error models and error compensation procedure for three axes vertical machining center using rigid body kinematics. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 40 (1), 1199-1213.
13. Piegl, L. and Tiller, W., 1995. The NURBS Book. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
14. Renishaw plc. New Mills, Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 8JR, UK. Available from: www.renishaw.com
15. Simon, C.P. and Blume, L.E., 1994. Mathematics for Economists. New York: W.W. Norton.
16. Suh, S.H., Lee, E.S., and Sohn, J.W., 1999. Enhancement of geometric accuracy via an intermediate geometrical feedback scheme. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 18 (1), 12-21.
17. Tlusty, J., 1980. Testing of Accuracy of Machine Tools, UCRL-52960-Supp. 1, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, CA.
18. Wilhelm, R.G., Srinivasan, N., and Farabaugh, F., 1997. Part form errors predicted from machine tool performance measurements. CIRP Annals, 46 (1), 471-474.