Channels of published research communication used by Malaysian authors in computer science and information technology

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 105-118

  Gu, Y ^a   Zainab, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Channels for research communication; Computer science; Information technology; Publication output; Publication productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449583441     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1994 Malaysian Science and Technology Indicators Report (1996). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia. Also available at: http://www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/sesti94/.
2. 1994 National Survey of Research and Development (1996).Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia. Also available at: http://www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/rnd1994.htm.
3. 1996 Malaysian Science and Technology Indicators Report (1998). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia. Also available at: http://www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/sntind/default.htm.
4. 1996 National Survey of Research and Development (Revised Version) (1998). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment, Malaysia. Also available at: http://www.mastic.gov.my/mastic/pages/sernd96/rnd1.htm.
5. Allen, Robert S. 1991. Physics information and scientific communication: information sources and communication patterns, Science & Tech Library, Vol.11, no.3: 27-38.
6. Arenas, J. Licea de. 1992. Partial assessment of Mexican health sciences research 1982-1986, Scientometrics, Vol.23: 47-55.
7. Arora, J. and Sharan Pal Kaur. 1994. Bibliometric analysis of core journals on immunology: a study based on the Annual Review of Immununology, Annals of Library Science & Documentation, Vol.41, no.3: 81-94.
8. Budd, John. 1986. Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: a citation study, Library and Information Science Research, Vol.8: 189-211.
9. Chen, Ching-chih. 1972. The use of pattern of physics journals in a large academic research library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.23: 254-265.
10. Drott, M. Carl. 1995. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.46, no.4: 299-305.
11. Flowers, B.H. 1965. Survey of information needs of physicists and chemists, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 21: 32-112.
12. Fussler, Herman H. 1949. Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States, Library Quarterly, Vol. 19: 19-35.
13. Garg, Kailash and Ashok Kumar. 1984. Information gathering habits of R & D scientists: a survey. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol.31: 63-73.
14. Hallmark, Julie. 1994. Scientist's access and retrieval of references cited in their recent journal articles. College and Research Libraries, Vol.55: 199-208.
15. Hart, Richard L. 1997. Information gathering among the faculty of a comprehensive college: formality and globally. Journal of Academic Librarianship. Vol.23: 21-27.
16. Heinzkill, Richard. 1980. Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals, Library Quarterly, Vol. 50: 352-65.
17. Leckie, Pettigrew, Karen E and Christian Sylvain, Christian. 1996. Modelling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals and lawyers. Library Quarterly, Voll. 66: 161-193.
18. Pao, Miranda Lee. 1980. Co-authorship as communication measure, Library Research, Vol. 2: 327-38.
19. Popovich, Charles J. 1975. Business management research characteristic and collection evaluation: a citation analysis of dissertations, ERIC Document. EDI36835.
20. Stern, Madeleine. 1983. Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship, College and Research Libraries, 44: 199-209.
21. Zachos, G. 1991. Research output evaluation of two university departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 21: 195-221.
22. Zainab, A.N. and Goi S.S. 1997. The characteristics of citations used by humanities researchers. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.2, no.2: 19-36.