Evaluating intercept-slope interactions in latent growth modeling

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 226-244

  Sun, Ronghua ^a   Willson, Victor L ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION VALUE; GROWTH MODELING; INTERACTION EFFECT; MISSPECIFICATION; MISSPECIFIED MODELS; SPURIOUS INTERACTIONS; STANDARD ERRORS; TYPE I ERROR RATE;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 70449578725     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705510902751051     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Joreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40-52.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1995). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109-121.
4. Champoux, J. E., & Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, effect size, and power in moderated regression. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 243-255.
5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
7. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343-367.
8. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
9. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2006). Structural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
10. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children's cognitive growth in reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205-224.
11. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
12. Hughes, J. N., Meehan, B. T., & Cavell, T. A. (2004). Development and validation of a gender-balanced measure of aggression-relevant social cognition. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 292-302
13. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348-357.
14. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Kenny, D., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interaction effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210.
17. Klein, A. G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maxium likelihhod estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMA method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474.
18. Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220-232.
19. Li, F., Duncan, T. E., & Acock, A. (2000). Modeling interaction effects in latent growth curve models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 497-533.
20. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275-300.
21. Moulder, B. C., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1-19.
22. Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2003). Modeling interactions between latent and observed continuous variables using maximum-likelihood estimation in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes, 6(version 1).
23. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers-Users' guide. Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
24. Schumacker, R. E., & Marcoulides, G. (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
26. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 1-29.