Covariance matrix adapted evolution strategy algorithm-based solution to dynamic economic dispatch problems

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 635-657

  Manoharan, P S ^a   Kannan, P S ^a   Baskar, S ^a   Willjuice Iruthayarajan, M ^a   Dhananjeyan, V ^a  

^a THIAGARAJAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (India)

Author keywords

Covariance matrix adapted evolution strategy (CMAES); Dynamic economic dispatch; Electrical power systems; Karush Kuhn Tucker conditions; Penalty parameter less scheme; Real coded genetic algorithm

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE MATRIX ADAPTED EVOLUTION STRATEGY (CMAES); DYNAMIC ECONOMIC DISPATCH; ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS; KARUSH-KUHN-TUCKER CONDITIONS; PENALTY-PARAMETER-LESS SCHEME; REAL-CODED GENETIC ALGORITHM;

ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES TO APPARATUS; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTICAL FILTERS; POPULATION STATISTICS; SEQUENTIAL SWITCHING;

COVARIANCE MATRIX;

EID: 70449558968     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150902738768     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aruldoss, T. and Jeyakumar, E., 2005. Reserve constrained dynamic dispatch of units with valve-point effects. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20 (3), 1273-1282.
2. Attaviriyanupap, P., et al., 2001. Dynamic economic dispatch using evolutionary programming combine with sequential quadratic programming. IEEE-ISAP 2001 Conference, June 2001, Budapest, Hungary, 1-6.
3. Attaviriyanupap, P., et al., 2002.A hybrid EP and SQP for dynamic economic dispatch with non-smooth fuel cost function. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17 (2), 411-416.
4. Balamurugan, R. and Subramanian, S., 2007. An improved differential evolution based dynamic economic dispatch with nonsmooth fuel cost function. Journal of Electric Systems, 3 (3), 151-161.
5. Baskar, S., et al., 2001. Optimal capacitor placement in distribution systems using sequential decomposed genetic algorithms. Journal of Institution of Engineers (India), 82, 36-42.
6. Baskar, S., et al., 2005. Design of optimal length low-dispersion FBG filter using covariance matrix adapted evolution. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 17 (10), 2119-2121.
7. Deb, K., 2000. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186, 311-338.
8. Deb, K., et al., 2007. Finding trade-off solutions close to KKT points using evolutionary multi-objective optimization. IIT Kanpur, KanGAL Report Number 2007006.
9. Deb, K., 2001. Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
10. Gaing, Z.L., 2003. Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18 (3), 1167-1195.
11. Hansen, N., 2006a. The CMA evolution strategy: A comparing review. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 192, 75-102.
12. Hansen, N., 2006b. CMA-ES in MATLAB. Available from: http://www.loc.fr/ excl;hansen/cmaes-inmatlab.html
13. Lagarias, J.C., et al., 1998. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex method in lowdimensions. SIAM Journal of Optimization, 9 (1), 112-147.
14. Manoharan, P.S., et al., 2008. Penalty parameter-less constraint handling scheme based evolutionary algorithm solutions to economic dispatch. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2 (4), 478-490.
15. Panigrahi, C.K., et al., 2006. Simulated annealing technique for dynamic economic dispatch. Electric Power Components and Systems, 34 (5), 577-586.
16. Walters, D., Sheble, C., and Gerald, B., 1993. Genetic algorithm solution of economic dispatch with valve point loading. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 8 (3), 1325-1332.
17. Wong, K.P. and Fung, C.C., 1993. Simulated annealing based economic dispatch algorithm. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers C, 140, 509-515.
18. Wood, A.J. andWollenberg, B.F., 1996. Power generation, operation and control. NewYork:Wiley.
19. Yang, H.T., Yang, P.C., and Huang, C.L., 1996. Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch for units with non-smooth fuel cost functions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11 (1), 112-118.