Privacy-enhanced user-centric identity management

IEEE International Conference on Communications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Ahn, Gail Joon ^a   Ko, Moonam ^b   Shehab, Mohamed ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL IDENTITY; IDENTITY INFORMATION; IDENTITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; METASYSTEM; PRIVACY ISSUE; PROOF OF CONCEPT; RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES; USER-CENTRIC; USER-CENTRIC IDENTITY;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70449553983     PISSN: 05361486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199363     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. The legion of the bouncy castle. Available at http://www.bouncycastle. org/.
2. Opensaml - an open source security assertion language toolkit. Available at http://www.opensaml.org/.
3. R. Agrawal, J. Kiernan, R. Srikant, and Y. Xu. Xpref: a preference language for p3p. Computer Networks, 48(5):809-827, 2005.
4. G.-J. Ahn and J. Lam. Managing privacy preferences for federated identity management. In Digital Identity Management, pages 28-36, 2005.
5. M. Alsaleh and C. Adams. Enhancing consumer privacy in the liberty alliance identity federation and web services frameworks. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pages 59-77, 2006.
6. Burtongroup. Recapping the catalyst user-centric interop.
7. K. Cameron. The laws of identity. Whitepaper, Microsoft, Available at http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/, May 2005.
8. K. Cameron and M. Jones. Design rationale behind the identity metasystem architecture. Whitepaper, Microsoft, Available at http://www.identityblog.com.
9. A. Cavoukian. The case for privacy-embedded laws of identity in the digital age. Technical report.
10. L. F. Cranor, M. Arjula, and P. Guduru. Use of a p3p user agent by early adopters. In WPES, pages 1-10, 2002.
11. L. F. Cranor, P. Guduru, and M. Arjula. User interfaces for privacy agents. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 13(2):135-178, 2006.
12. M. J. Culnan and G. R. Milne. The culnan-milne survey on consumers and online privacy notices: Summary of responses. Technical report.
13. T. Daemen and I. Rubinstein. The identity metasystem: Towards a privacy-compliant soultion to the challenges of digital identity. Technical report.
14. G. Hogben. Suggestions for long term chagnes to p3p. 2003.
15. M. B. Jones. The identity metasystem: A user-centric, inclusive web authentication solution. Positionpaper, Microsoft, Available at hwww.w3.org/2005/Security/usability-ws/papers/28-jones-id-metasystem/, March 2006.
16. S. E. Levy and C. Gutwin. Improving understanding of website privacy policies with fine-grained policy anchors. In WWW, pages 480-488, 2005.
17. M. L. Lorrie Cranor and M. Marchiori. A p3p preference exchange language 1.0 (appel1.0). Technical report.
18. M. M. M. P.-M. Lorrie Cranor, Marc Langheinrich and J. Reagle. The platform for privacy preferences 1.0 (p3p1.0) specification. Technical report.
19. Microsoft. Windows cardspace.
20. Microsoft. Microsofts vision for an identity metasystem. Whitepaper, Microsoft, Available at http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/understanding/ advancedwebservices/default.aspx? pull=/library/enus/dnwebsrv/html/ identitymetasystem.asp, May 2005.
21. B. Pfitzmann. Privacy in enterprise identity federation - policies for liberty single signon. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pages 189-204, 2003.
22. L. A. Project. Liberty architecture framework for supporting privacy preference expression language (ppels). Technical report.
23. A. C. Squicciarini, A. A. Hintoglu, E. Bertino, and Y. Saygin. A privacy preserving assertion based policy language for federation systems. In SACMAT '07: Proceedings of the 12th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, pages 51-60, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.