Effect of crop management on epidemics of phomopsis stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi) for susceptible and tolerant sunflower cultivars

Field Crops Research

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 50-60

  Debaeke, P ^a   Moinard, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b DRAAF SRAL Midi Pyrénées ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Diaporthe helianthi; Epidemiological model; Microclimate; N fertilization; Plant density; Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; CULTIVAR; DENSITY; DICOTYLEDON; EPIDEMIC; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FIELD METHOD; FUNGAL DISEASE; IRRIGATION; LESION; MICROCLIMATE; NITROGEN; RELATIVE HUMIDITY; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TOLERANCE; YIELD RESPONSE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DIAPORTHE HELIANTHI; FUNGI; HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; NARTHECIUM; PHOMOPSIS;

EID: 70449535428     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Acimovic M. The effect of Phomopsis sp. infection on grain yield and oil content of sunflower plants. Helia 9 (1986) 73-76
2. Acimovic M., and Straser N. Phomopsis sp.-a new parasite in sunflower. Helia 4 (1981) 43-58
3. Battilani P., Rossi V., Girometta B., Delos M., Rouzet J., André N., and Esposito S. Estimating the potential development of Diaporthe helianthi epidemics in Italy. EPPO Bull. 33 (2003) 427-431
4. Bourke P.M.A. Use of weather information in prediction of plant disease epiphytotics. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 8 (1970) 345-370
5. Cetiom, 1995. Le Phomopsis du tournesol. Oléoscope, N° Spécial 14, Cetiom, Paris.
6. Debaeke P., Delos M., Moinard J., Bérault S., and Lambert R. Prise en compte du couvert de tournesol dans la simulation des épidémies de Diaporthe helianthi par le modèle ASPHODEL. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Plant Diseases. AFPP, Tours, France (2000) 251-258
7. Debaeke P., Delos M., and Moinard J. Simulating the influence of sowing date on disease occurrence in sunflower. Proceedings of the 2nd International ESA Symposium Modelling Cropping Systems. Firenze, Italy (2001) 123-124
8. Debaeke P., and Pérès A. Effects of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) crop management on Phoma black stem (Phoma macdonaldii Boerema). Crop Prot. 22 (2003) 741-752
9. Debaeke P., and Estragnat A. A simple model to interpret the effects of sunflower crop management on the occurrence and severity of a major fungal disease: Phomopsis stem canker. Field Crops Res. 83 (2003) 139-155
10. Debaeke P., and Raffaillac D. Normalized SPAD index and Nitrogen Nutrition Index (NNI): two indicators of plant N status for sunflower crop. Proceedings of the 9th ESA Congress. Warsaw (Poland) (2006) 83-84
11. Debaeke P., and Estragnat A. Crop canopy indicators for the early prediction of phomopsis stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi) in sunflower. Crop Protect. 28 (2009) 792-801
12. Debaeke P., Estragnat A., and Reau R. Influence of crop management on sunflower stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi). Agronomie 23 (2003) 581-592
13. Degener J., Melchinger A.E., and Hahn V. Resistance in the leaf and stem of sunflower after infection with two isolates of Phomopsis. Plant Breeding 118 (1999) 405-410
14. Delos M., and Moinard J. Evolution du Phomopsis du tournesol en France. Un bref historique. Phytoma 473 (1995) 22-24
15. Delos M., and Moinard J. ASPHODEL: Modèle de simulation des épidémies de Phomopsis du tournesol (Diaporthe helianthi). Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent 61 2b (1996) 555-565
16. Delos M., and Moinard J. Phomopsis du tournesol: nouveaux progrès dans la prévision des épidémies. Phytoma 492 (1997) 17-21
17. Delos M., Moinard J., and Eychenne N. Etude de l'épidémiologie de Leptosphaeria lindquistii, agent de la maladie des taches noires du tournesol en France. Proceedings of the 15th International Sunflower Conference, vol. 2. Toulouse, France (2000) 32-37
18. Diaz Franco A., and Ortegon Morales A. Influence of sunflower stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi) on seed quality and yield during seed development. Helia 20 (1997) 57-62
19. Duthie J.A. Models of the response of foliar parasites to the combined effects of temperature and duration of wetness. Phytopathology 8 (1997) 1088-1095
20. Encheva V., Tonev T.K., and Yankov P. Independent and combined effect of genotype and some agronomic factors on yield and Phomopsis helianthi infection in sunflower. II. Effect on Phomopsis helianthi. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 9 (2003) 615-620
21. Fazekas M. Study of relationships between the time and intensity of sunflower flowering and infection rate of Phomopsis (Diaporthe) helianthi Munt.-Cvet et al. Novenyvedelem 25 (1989) 158-162
22. Gulya T., Rashid K.Y., and Masirevic S.M. Sunflower diseases. In: Schneiter A.A. (Ed). Sunflower Technology and Production (1997), ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA 263-379
23. Huber L., and Gillespie T.J. Modelling leaf wetness in relation to plant disease epidemiology. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 30 (1992) 553-577
24. Jinga V., Iliescu H., Ionita A., Csep N., and Iordache E. Technological factors in the integrated control of sunflower diseases. Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference. ISA, Pisa, Italy (1992) 761-765
25. Jouffret P. Stratégie de lutte durable contre phomopsis et phoma. Oléoscope 80 (2005) 28-30
26. Masirevic S.M., and Gulya T. Sclerotinia and Phomopsis-two devastating sunflower pathogens. Field Crops Res. 30 (1992) 271-300
27. Moinard J., and Lecomte V. Grille et modèle à l'assaut du phomopsis en Midi-Pyrénées. Oléoscope 74 (2004) 25-27
28. Muntanola-Cvetkovic M., Mihaljcevic M., and Petrov M. On the identity of the causative agent of a serious Phomopsis-Diaporthe disease in sunflower plants. Nova Hedwig. 34 (1981) 417-435
29. Penaud A., Pérès A., and Regnault Y. Rappels sur la maladie. In: Le Page R. (Ed). Le Phomopsis du tournesol (1995), Cetiom, Paris 15-26
30. Pérès A., and Regnault Y. Diaporthe helianthi Munt. Cvet. et al.: Eléments de biologie et d'épidémiologie appliqués aux essais de lutte. Proceedings of the 12th International Sunflower Conference, vol. II. ISA, Novi-Sad, Yugoslavia (1988) 90-95
31. Pinochet X. Phomopsis et évaluation variétale de la sensibilité. In: Le Page R. (Ed). Le Phomopsis du tournesol (1995), Cetiom, Paris 27-36
32. Pinochet X., and Estragnat A. Field evaluation of hybrid sensitivity to Diaporthe helianthi: relationship between symptoms and yield losses. Proceedings of the 14th International Sunflower Conference, Beijing (China) (1996) 777-780
33. Pinochet X., and Pérès A. Evaluation des variétés de tournesol et Phomopsis. La présence du phoma est-elle gênante?. Oléoscope 46 (1998) 35-37
34. Pouzet A., and Bugat A. Description d'une méthode simple et rapide pour l'estimation de la surface foliaire par plante chez le tournesol. Proceedings of the 11th International Sunflower Conference. ISA, Mar del Plata, Argentina (1985) 21-26
35. Stanojevic D. Relationship between stand density and microclimate and their effect on some characters of sunflower. Proceedings of the 11th International Sunflower Conference. ISA, Mar del Plata, Argentina (1985) 301-306
36. Viguié A., Serre F., Walser P., Vear F., and Tourvieille de Labrouhe D. The use of natural infections under controlled conditions and of artificial infections to estimate Phomopsis resistance of sunflower hybrids: conclusions after ten years of trials. Proceedings of the 15th International Sunflower Conference, vol. II, Section K. Toulouse, France (2000) 78-83
37. Viguié A., Tourvieille de Labrouhe D., and Vear F. Inheritance of several sources of resistance to Phomopsis stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvet.) in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 116 (2000) 167-179