Three-year field response of drip-irrigated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Tempranillo) to soil salinity

Plant and Soil

Volumn 324, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 219-230

  Urdanoz, V ^a   Aragues R ^a  

^a Agrifood Institute of Aragón IA2   (Spain)

Author keywords

Boundary analysis; Ion toxicity; Leaf Cl; Leaf Na; Osmotic effect; Salinity tolerance

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRIP IRRIGATION; GROWTH RATE; LEAF; ROOTSTOCK; SALINITY TOLERANCE; SODIUM; VINE;

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 70449533157     PISSN: 0032079X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-9948-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aragüés R, Puy J, Isidoro D (2004) Vegetative growth response of young olive trees (Olea europaea L., cv. Arbequina) to soil salinity and waterlogging. Plant Soil 258:68-80. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016537.61832.6e.
2. Aragüés R, Puy J, Royo A, Espada JL (2005) Three-year field response of young olive trees (Olea europaea L., cv. Arbequina) to soil salinity: trunk growth and leaf ion accumulation. Plant Soil 271:265-273. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-2695-9.
3. Bassoi LH, Hopmans JW, Jorge LAdC, Alencar CMd, Silva JAMe (2003) Grapevine root distribution in drip and microsprinkler irrigation. Sci Agric. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162003000200024.
4. Bernstein L, Ehlig CF, Clark RA (1969) Effect of grape rootstocks on chloride accumulation in leaves. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-2695-9.
5. Cotlove E (1963) Determination of true chloride content of biological fluids and tissues II. Analysis by simple nonisotopic methods. Anal Chem 35:101-105. doi:10.1021/ac60194a031.
6. Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Oster JD, Kaffka SR (2006) Monitoring management-induced spatio-temporal changes in soil quality throough soil sampling directed by apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 131:369-387. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.014.
7. Downton WJS (1977) Influence of rootstocks on accumulation of chloride, sodium and potassium in grapevines. Aust J Agric Res. doi:10.1071/AR9770879.
8. Downton WJS (1985) Growth and mineral composition of the sultana grapevine as influenced by salinity and rootstock. Aust J Agric Res. doi:10.1071/AR9850425.
9. Ehlig CF (1960) Effects of salinity on four varieties of table grapes grown in sand culture. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 76:323-331.
10. Fisarakis I, Chartzoulakis K, Stavrakas D (2001) Response of Sultana vines (v. vinifera L.) on six rootstoks to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery. Agr Water Manage. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00115-9.
11. Francois LE, Clark RA (1979) Accumulation of Na and Cl in leaves of sprinkler-irrigated grapes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104:11-13.
12. Isla R, Aragüés R, Royo A (2003) Spatial variability of salt-affected soils in the middle Ebro valley (Spain) and implications in plant breeding for increased productivity. Euphytica. doi:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000004988.25257.91.
13. Maas EV, Grattan SR (1999) Crop growths as affected by salinity. In: Skaggs RW, van Schilfgaarde J (eds) Agricultural drainage, Agronomy 38. Amer Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 55-110.
14. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J Irrig Drain 103(IR2):115-134.
15. Milne AE, Ferguson RB, Lark RM (2006) Estimating a boundary line model for a biological response by maximum likelihood. Ann Appl Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00086.x.
16. Prior LD, Grieve AM, Cullis BR (1992a) Sodium chloride and soil texture interactions in irrigated field grown sultana grapevines. I. Yield and fruit quality. Aust J Agric Res. doi:10.1071/AR9921051.
17. Prior LD, Grieve AM, Cullis BR (1992b) Sodium chloride and soil texture interactions in irrigated field grown sultana grapevines. II. Plant mineral content, growth and physiology. Aust J Agric Res. doi:10.1071/AR9921067.
18. Rhoades JD, Chanduvi F, Lesch S (1999) Soil salinity assessment. Methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper n° 57. Rome.
19. Shani U, Ben-Gal A (2005) Long-term response of grapevines to salinity: osmotic effects and ion toxicity. Am J Enol Vitic 56:148-154.
20. Shatar TM, McBratney AB (2004) Boundary-line analysis of field-scale yield response to soil properties. J Agric Sci 142:553-560. doi:10.1017/S0021859604004642.
21. Sinclair C, Hoffmann AA (2003) Monitoring salt stress in grapevines: are measures of plant trait variability useful? J Appl Ecol. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00843.x.
22. Steppuhn, H, van Genuchten MTh, Grieve, CM (2005) Root-zone salinity: II. Indices for tolerance in agricultural crops. Corp Sci 45:221-232.
23. Stevens RM, Walker RR (2002) Response of grapevines to irrigation-induced saline-sodic soil conditions. Aust J Exp Agric 42:323-331. doi:10.1071/EA00143.
24. USSL (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. United States Salinity Laboratory, United Sates Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 60.
25. Walker RR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR, Correll RL (2002) Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana).: 1. Yield and vigour inter-relationships. Aust J Grape Wine R. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2002.tb00206.x.
26. Webb RA (1972) Use of the boundary line in the analysis of biological data. J Hortic Sci 47:309-319.