An approach to expert assessment in software engineering

Cybernetics and Systems Analysis

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 638-654

  Lavrischeva, E M ^a   Slabospickaya, O A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

Assessment problem; Expertise technology; Homomorphism; Mathematical apparatus; Metrized similarity; Model of an expert assessment process; Ontology; Production of software systems; Validity of an expert decision; Value tree

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT PROBLEM; EXPERTISE TECHNOLOGY; HOMOMORPHISM; MATHEMATICAL APPARATUS; METRIZED SIMILARITY; VALIDITY OF AN EXPERT DECISION; VALUE TREE;

FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONTOLOGY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 70449522073     PISSN: 10600396     EISSN: 15738337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10559-009-9131-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ISO/IEC TR 19759:2005, Software Engineering - Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) (2005), http://www.geocities.com/lbu- measure/swebok/swebok.htm.
2. Guide to PMBOK. A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMBOK GUIDE, Third Edition, http://www.pmi.org/emeaelink/pmiE-link10-04.pdf.
3. Computing Curricula, http://computer.org/education/cc2001.
4. E. M. Lavrishcheva, G. I. Koval and T. M. Korotun, "An approach to the software quality management," Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, No. 5, 758-768 (2006).
5. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering [Russian translation], Izd. Dom "Williams," Moscow-St. Petersburg-Kiev (2002).
6. E. M. Lavrishcheva, Programming Methods: Theory, Engineering, and Practice [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (2006).
7. E. M. Lavrishcheva, "Software engineering as a scientific and engineering discipline," Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, No. 3, 324-332 (2008).
8. E. M. Lavrishcheva, "Classification of software engineering disciplines," Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, No. 6, 792-796 (2008).
9. M. Matinlassi, E. Niemela, and L. Dobrica, Quality-driven architecture design and quality analysis method. A revolutionary initiation approach to a product line architecture, ESPOO 2002, http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/ 2002/P456.pdf.
10. V. M. Glushkov, Foundations of Paperless Informatics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1982).
11. P. I. Andon, L. D. Babko, and G. I. Koval, DSTU ISO/IEC 14756:2008 Information Technologies. Measurement and Assessment of Performance of Software Systems, 1st Edition, Derzhspozhivstandard (2008).
12. G. B. Moroz and T. M. Korotun, "Risk-operational approach to the solution of the problem of optimum release of software systems," Probl. Progr., Nos. 2-3, 231-236 (2006).
13. F. G. Olumofin and V. B. Misic, "Extending the ATAM architecture evaluation to product line architectures," http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/ ~vmisic/pubs/tr0502.pdf.
14. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press (1986).
15. D. S. Shmerling, S. A. Dubrovskii, T. D. Arzhanova, and A. A. Frenkel, "Expert judgments: Methods and applications," Stat. Methody Analiza Expertn. Otsenok, Uch. Zap. po Statistike, 29, Nauka, Moscow (1977).
16. B. G. Litvak, Expert Examination and Decision-Making [in Russian], Patent, Moscow (1996).
17. O. O. Slabospic'ka, "Integrating model of the process of expert assessment activity in life cycles of software systems," Probl. Progr., Nos. 2-3, 279-287 (2008).
18. L. J. Osterweil, B. I. Simidchievz, L. A. Klarke, et al., "Representing process variation with a process family," in: Q. Wang, D. Pfahl, and D. M. Raffo (eds.), Software Process Dynamics and Agility, International Conference on Software Process, ICSP 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2007), pp. 109-120, http://laser.cs.umass.edu/techreports/07-13.pdf.
19. N. F. Noy, R. W. Fergerson, and M. A. Musen, The Knowledge Model of Protégé-2000: Combining Interoperability and Flexibility, www.pms.ifi.lmu.de/mitarbeiter/ohlbach/Ontology/Protege/SMI-2000830.pdf.
20. A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Blázquez, M. Fernández, et al., Ontologies at the Knowledge Level Using the Ontology Design Environment, http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/blazquez/.
21. E. P. Ilyin and O. A. Slabospickaya, "Forms, metrics, and properties of the similarity relation between concepts in ontologies of expert viewpoints," Probl. Progr., No. 4, 39-49 (2005).
22. A. M. Rappoport and M. V. Schneiderman, "Analysis of expert judgments represented by structures," Prikl. Mnogomern. Stat. Analiz, Uch. Zap. po Statistike, Nauka, Moscow, No. 33, 150-164 (1978).
23. E. P. Ilyin, Yu. V. Ol'khovskaya, and O. A. Slabospickaya, "Construction and substantiation of the generalized tree of value criteria in taking into account different viewpoints on a multicriteria assessment problem," Probl. Progr., Nos. 2-3, 344-352 (2004).
24. E. P. Ilyina and O. A. Slabospickaya, "Objectives and criteria of logical-statistical analysis of expert preferences under conditions of a conflict between viewpoints on the object domain of a choice problem," Probl. Progr., Nos. 1-2, 471-483 (2000).
25. O. A. Slabospickaya, "A formal apparatus of expert solution of a multicriteria assessment problem with allowance for some viewpoints on the problem," Probl. Progr., Nos. 1-2, 430-440 (2002).
26. F. Francella and D. Bannister, New Method of Personality Study [Russian translation], Progress, Moscow (1987).
27. O. A. Slabospickaya, "An approach to the development of support tools for expertise of hierarchical alternatives in a developing object domain," Probl. Progr., No. 4, 51-58 (1998).
28. M. Hollender and D. A. Vulf, Nonparametric Statistics [Russian translation], Finansy i Statistika, Moscow (1983).