"Hishuk Tsawak" (Everything Is One/Connected): A Huu-ay-aht worldview for seeing forestry in British Columbia, Canada

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 789-804

  Castleden, Heather ^a   Garvin, Theresa ^b   Nation, Huu ay aht First ^c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

British Columbia; Canada; First nations; Forestry; Indigenous knowledge; Place; Power; Resilience; Resistance; Worldview

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESILIENCE;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 70449509532     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920802098198     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alfred, T. 1999. Peace, power, righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. Don Mills, ON, Canada: Oxford University Press.
2. Allen, A. 2005. Feminist perspectives on power. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2005 edition), ed. E. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2005/entries/feminist-power (accessed 4 September 2007).
3. Atleo, R. U. 2004. Tsawalk: A Nuu-chah-nulth worldview. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
4. Battiste, M. and J. Youngblood. 2000. Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon, SK: Purich Publishing.
5. Baxter, J. and J. Eyles. 1997. Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing "rigour" in interview analysis. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 22(4):505-525.
6. BC Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation. 2006. The Maa-Nulth First Nations final agreement. http://www.gov.bc.ca/arr/firstnation/maa_nulth/down/final/brochure.pdf (accessed 26 February 2007).
7. Berger, P. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
8. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
9. Berkes, F. and N. Turner. 2006. Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Hum. Ecol. 34(4):479-494.
10. Berry, A. 2006. Public lands: Lessons from British Columbia: Public forest management. Bozeman, MT: Property and Environment Research Center.
11. Braun, B. 2002. The intemperate rainforest: Nature, culture, and power on Canada's west coast. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Canada, Maa-nulth First Nations, and British Columbia. 2006. Maa-Nulth First Nations: Final agreement. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation. http://www.gov.bc.ca/arr/firstnation/maa_nulth/down/final/mna_fa.pdf (accessed 26 October 2007).
13. Carolan, M. 2006. Ecological representation in deliberation: The contribution of tactile spaces. Environ. Polit. 15(3):345-361.
14. Carr, D. and K. Halvorsen. 2001. An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Society Nat. Resources 14:107-126.
15. Castleden, H. 2007. As sacred as cedar and salmon: A collaborative study with Huu-ay-aht First Nation, British Columbia into understanding the meaning of "resources" from an Indigenous worldview. PhD dissertation, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
16. Castleden, H., T. Garvin, and Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2008. Modifying photovoice for community-based participatory indigenous research. Social Sci. Med. 66(6):1393-1405.
17. Council of Forest Industries. 2007. Aboriginal affairs. http://www.cofi.org/what_we_do/aboriginal_affairs.htm (accessed 23 May 2007).
18. Cresswell, T. 1996. In place=out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
19. Creswell, J. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Curran, D. and M. M'Gonigle. 1999. Aboriginal forestry: Community management as opportunity and imperative. Osgoode Hall Law J. 37(4):711-774.
21. Davis, W. 1999. Foreword. In Falldown: Forest policy in British Columbia, eds. P. Marchak, S. Aycock, and D. Herbert, xi-xv. Vancouver, BC, Canada: David Suzuki Foundation and Ecotrust Canada.
22. Dearden, P. and B. Mitchell. 2005. Environmental change and challenge, 2nd ed. Don Mills, ON, Canada: Oxford University Press.
23. Demeritt, D. 2002. What is the "social construction of nature"? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progr. Hum. Geogr. 26(6):767-790.
24. Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln, eds. 2005. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Fournier, S. and E. Crey. 1997. Stolen from our embrace: The abduction of First Nations children and the restoration of Aboriginal communities. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Douglas & McIntyre Ltd.
26. Gamborg, C. and F. Rune. 2004. Economic and ecological approaches to assessing forest value in managed forests: Ethical perspectives. Society Nat. Resources 17(9):799-815.
27. Goodluck, C. and A. Willeto. 2004. American Indian and Alaskan Native family resiliency: A protective rainbow. Seattle, WA: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
28. Government of British Columbia. 2001. The new relationship. http://www.gov.bc.ca/arr/newrelationship/down/new_relationship.pdf (accessed 3 May 2007).
29. Government of Canada. 1996. The Indian Act. In Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Volume 1-Looking forward, looking back. Part two: False assumptions and a failed relationship. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Supply and Services Canada.
30. Happynook, T. 2000. Cultural biodiversity: Indigenous relationships within their environment. International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade: Microbehaviour and Macroresults International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade Conference, 9-14 July, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. http://oregonstate.edu/dept/IIFET/2000/papers/happynook2.pdf (accessed 28 March 2008).
31. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
32. Harris, C. 2002. Making native space: Colonialism, resistance, and reserves in British Columbia. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
33. Harris, C. 2004. How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94(1):165-182.
34. Hayter, R. 2003. The war in the woods: Post-fordist restructuring, globalization, and the contested remapping of British Columbia's forest economy. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 93(3):706-729.
35. Heavy Runner, I. and K. Marshall. 2003. Miracle survivors: Promoting resilience in Indian students. Tribal Coll. J. Am. Indian Higher Educ. 14:15-17.
36. Helfield, J. and R. Naiman. 2006. Keystone interactions: Salmon and bear in riparian forests of Alaska. Ecosystems 9(2):167-180.
37. Howitt, R. 2001. Rethinking resource management: Justice, sustainability and Indigenous peoples. London: Routledge.
38. Howitt, R. 2005. The importance of process in social impact assessment: Ethics, methods and process for cross-cultural engagement. Ethics Place Environ. 8(2):209-221.
39. Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2005a. The heart of the people. http://www.huuayaht.ca/heart.htm (accessed 15 April 2005).
40. Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2005b. Sacred cedar. http://www.huuayaht.ca/sacred.htm accessed 15 April 2005
41. Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2007a. Huu-ay-aht First Nations release official results of constitution vote. http://www.huuayaht.org (accessed 1 May 2007).
42. Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2007b. Huu-ay-aht First Nation: Culture and history. http://huuayaht.com/culture.htm (accessed 5 March 2007).
43. Huu-ay-aht First Nation. 2007c. Huu-ay-aht First Nation: Hishuk Tsawak. http://huuayaht.com/hishuk.htm (accessed 7 March 2007).
44. LaFromboise, T., D. Hoyt, L. Oliver, and L. Whitbeck. 2006. Family, community, and school influences on resilience among American Indian adolescents in the upper Midwest. J. Commun. Psychol. 34(2):193-209.
45. Lee, S. and W. Roth. 2006. Community-level controversy over a natural resource: Toward a more democratic science in society. Society Nat. Resources 19(5):429-445.
46. Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view, 2nd expanded ed. London: Macmillan.
47. M'Gonigle, M. 2000. A new naturalism: Is there a (radical) "truth" beyond the (postmodern) abyss? Ecotheology J. Religion Nature Environ. 8:8-39.
48. Mabee, H. and G. Hoberg. 2004. Protecting culturally significant areas through watershed planning in Clayoquot Sound. For. Chron. 80(2):229-240.
49. McGregor, D. 2004. Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. Am. Indian Q. 28(3&4):385-410.
50. Menzies, C., ed. 2006. Traditional ecological knowledge and natural resource management. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
51. Miles, M. and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Mitchell, B. 2002. Resource and environmental management, 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.
53. Nadasdy, P. 2003. Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge and aboriginal-state relations in the southwest Yukon. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
54. Pile, S. and M. Keith, eds. 1997. Geographies of resistance. London: Routledge.
55. Pojar, J. and A. Mackinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest coast: Washington, Oregon, British Columbia, and Alaska. Redmond, WA: Lone Pine.
56. Pred, A. 1984. Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time geography of becoming places. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 74(2):279-297.
57. Reed, M. 2000. Taking stands: A feminist perspective on "other" women's activism in forestry communities of northern Vancouver Island. Gender Place Culture 7(4):363-387.
58. Reed, M. 2007. Suzanne Mackenzie 2006 Memorial Lecture: Seeking red herrings in the wood: Tending the shared spaces of environmental and feminist geographies. Can. Geogr. 51(1):1-21.
59. Scientific Panel for Sustainable Forest Practices in Clayoquot Sound. 1995a. Scientific Panel for Sustainable Forest Practices in Clayoquot Sound Report: A vision and its context: Global context for forest practices in Clayoquot Sound. Victoria, BC, Canada: Government of British Columbia.
60. Scientific Panel for Sustainable Forest Practices in Clayoquot Sound. 1995b. First Nation's perspectives in relating to forest practices standards in Clayoquot Sound. Victoria, BC, Canada: Government of British Columbia.
61. Simms, N. 2004. Women's indigenous knowledge and community forest management in British Columbia: A case study with Huu-ay-aht First Nation. Master's thesis, Department of Geography and Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
62. Simpson, L. 2004. Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of Indigenous knowledge. Am. Indian Q. 28(3&4):373-384.
63. Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
64. Strittholt, J., D. Dellasala, and H. Jiang. 2006. Status of mature and old-growth forests in the Pacific Northwest. Conserv. Biol. 20(2):363-374.
65. Therborn, G. 1980. The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Thetford Press.
66. Tipa, G. and R. Welch. 2006. Comanagement of natural resources. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 42(3):373-391.
67. Turner, N. and F. Berkes. 2006. Coming to understanding: Developing conservation through incremental learning in the Pacific Northwest. Hum. Ecol. 34(4):495-513.
68. Turner, N., I. Davidson-Hunt, and M. O'Flaherty. 2003. Living on the edge: Ecological and cultural edges as sources of diversity for social-ecological resilience. Hum. Ecol. 31(3):439-461.
69. Usher, P. 2000. Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53(2):183-193.
70. Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.