Local mass media communication and environmental disputes: An analysis of press communication on the designation of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park in Italy

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 607-624

  Carrus, Giuseppe ^a   Cini, Francesca ^b   Bonaiuto, Marino ^b   Mauro, Alessandra ^b  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Environmental psychology; Mass media; Parks and protected areas

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MASS MEDIA; NATIONAL PARK; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POLITICAL CONFLICT; PSYCHOLOGY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE; TUSCAN ARCHIPELAGO; TUSCANY;

EID: 70449504701     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920802112734     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bell, A. 1994. Climate of opinion: Public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse Society 5:33-64.
2. Bolasco, S. 1999. Analisi Multidimensionale dei Dati [Multidimensional data analysis]. Rome: Carocci.
3. Bonaiuto, M., E. Bilotta, M. Bonnes, G. Carrus, E. Ceccarelli, and H. Martorella. 2008. Local identity moderating the role of individual differences in natural resource use: The case of water consumption. J. Appl. Social Psychol. 38:947-967.
4. Bonaiuto, M., G. Carrus, H. Martorella, and M. Bonnes. 2002. Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: The case of natural protected areas. J. Econ. Psychol. 23:631-653.
5. Bonnes, M. and M. Bonaiuto. 2002. Environmental psychology: From spatial physical environment to sustainable development. In Handbook of environmental psychology, eds. R. Bechtel and A. Churchman, 28-54. New York: Wiley.
6. Carrus, G., M. Bonaiuto, and M. Bonnes. 2005. Environmental concern, regional identity and support for protected areas in Italy. Environ. Behav. 37:237-257.
7. Castro, P. 2006. Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Contributions from the social representations approach. J. Commun. Appl. Social Psychol. 16:247-266.
8. Churchman, A. and E. Sadan. 2004. Environmental design and planning, public participation in. In Encyclopedia of applied psychology vol. I, ed. C. Spielberger, 793-800. New York: Elsevier=Academic Press.
9. Creswell, J. W. 2006. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.
10. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263-291.
11. Macnaghten, P., R. Brown, and S. Reicher. 1992. On the nature of the nature: Experimental studies in the power of rhetoric. J. Commun. Appl. Social Psychol. 2:5-28.
12. Pomerantz, A. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Hum. Stud. 9:219-229.
13. Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality. Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
14. Renn, O., T. Webler, H. Rakel, P. Dienel, and B. Johnson. 1993. Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure. Policy Sci. 26:189-214.
15. Stoll-Kleeman, S. 2001. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. J. Environ. Psychol. 21:369-385.