Contemporary New Zealand coefficients for the Trauma Injury Severity Score: TRISS(NZ)

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 122, Issue 1302, 2009, Pages 54-64

  Schluter, Philip J ^a,b   Cameron, Cate M ^c   Davey, Tamzyn M ^d   Civil, Ian ^e   Orchard, Jodie ^f   Dansey, Rangi ^e   Hamill, James ^g   Naylor, Helen ^g   James, Carolyn ^h,i   Dorrian, Jenny ^h   Christey, Grant ^h   Pollard, Cliff ^d   McClure, Rod J ^j  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (Australia)

^e AUCKLAND CITY HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^f NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^g MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^h WAIKATO HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

ⁱ WAIKATO DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD   (New Zealand)

^j MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLUNT TRAUMA; BREATHING RATE; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; HUMAN; INJURY SEVERITY; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; PENETRATING TRAUMA; PREDICTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TRAUMA INJURY SEVERITY SCORE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SURVIVAL RATE; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449499268     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Traub M, Cass D. Trauma Systems. In: McClure RJ, Stevenson M, McEvoy S, eds. The Scientific Basis of Injury Prevention and Control. East Hawthorn, Vic: IP Communications; 2004:233-245.
2. Davey TM, Pollard CW, Aitken LM, et al. Tackling the burden of injury in Australasia: developing a binational trauma registry. Med J Aust. 2006;185(9):512-514.
3. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370-378.
4. McDermott FT, Cooper GJ, Hogan PL, et al. Evaluation of the prehospital management of road traffic fatalities in Victoria, Australia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(4):219-227.
5. Ministry of Health. Our Health, Our Future: The Health of New Zealanders. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 1999.
6. Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Pitidis A, Vesconi S. Preventable trauma deaths: from panel review to population based-studies. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:12.
7. Findlay G, Martin IC, Carter S, et al. Trauma: Who cares? London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death; 2007.
8. Sugrue M, Caldwell E, D'Amours S, et al. Time for a change in injury and trauma care delivery: a trauma death review analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(11):949-954.
9. Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, McNeil JJ, et al. The trauma registry as a statewide quality improvement tool. J Trauma. 2005;59(6):1469-1476.
10. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R. TRISS: does it get better than this? Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(2):181-186.
11. Joosse P, Soedarmo S, Luitse JS, Ponsen KJ. Trauma outcome analysis of a Jakarta University Hospital using the TRISS method: validation and limitation in comparison with the major trauma outcome study. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 2001;51(1):134-140. (Pubitemid 33598897)
12. Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Hensberry R, Osler TM. A note on the disjointed nature of the injury severity score. J Trauma. 2004;57(3):479-485. (Pubitemid 39313826)
13. Glance LG, Osler T. Beyond the major trauma outcome study: benchmarking performance using a national contemporary, population-based trauma registry. J Trauma. 2001;51(4):725-727. (Pubitemid 33029292)
14. Bergeron E, Rossignol M, Osler T, et al. Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities. J Trauma. 2004;56(4):760-767. (Pubitemid 38534082)
15. Talwar S, Jain S, Porwal R, et al. Trauma scoring in a developing country. Singapore Med J. 1999;40(6):386-388.
16. Millham FH, LaMorte WW. Factors associated with mortality in trauma: re-evaluation of the TRISS method using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1090-1096.
17. Congdon P. Bayesian Statistical Modelling. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 2002.
18. Bouamra O, Wrotchford A, Hollis S, et al. A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: A comparison with the TRISS model. J Trauma. 2006;61(3):701-710. (Pubitemid 44400958)
19. Rutledge R, Osler T, Emery S, Kromhout-Schiro S. The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay. J Trauma. 1998;44(1):41-49. (Pubitemid 28095819)
20. Osler TM, Rogers FB, Badger GJ, et al. A simple mathematical modification of TRISS markedly improves calibration. J Trauma. 2002;53(4):630-634.
21. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, et al. Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation. J Trauma. 1996;40(1):42-48. (Pubitemid 126424991)
22. DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Holly C, et al. An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area. J Trauma. 2000;49(2):212-220. (Pubitemid 30687941)
23. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Finch CF. Is the revised trauma score still useful? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):944-948.
24. Moore L, Lavoie A, Abdous B, et al. Unification of the revised trauma score. J Trauma. 2006;61(3):718-722.
25. Skaga NO, Eken T, Hestnes M, et al. Scoring of anatomic injury after trauma: AIS 98 versus AIS 90 - do the changes affect overall severity assessment? Injury. 2007;38(1):84-90.
26. Burd RS, Ouyang M, Madigan D. Bayesian logistic injury severity score: a method for predicting mortality using international classification of disease-9 codes. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(5):466-475.