Nonlinear voxel-based modelling of the haemodynamic response in fMRI

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 237-253

  Kornak, John ^a,b   Dunham, Bruce ^c   Hall, Deborah A ^d   Haggard, Mark P ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^e University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constrained gamma curve; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Haemodynamic response function; Least squares estimation; Nonlinear curve fitting; Polynomial curve fitting

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449449344     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: 13600532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664760802443962     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. P.A. Bandettini, A. Jesmanowicz, E.C. Wong, and J.S. Hyde, Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain, Magn. Reson. Med. 30 (1993), pp. 161-173.
2. D.M. Bates and D.G. Watts, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications,Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1988.
3. P.S. Bellgowan, Z.S. Saad, and P.A. Bandettini, Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width, Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci.USA 100 (2003), pp. 1415-1419.
4. R. Bowtell, P. Mansfield, R.T. Coxon, P.R. Harvey, and P.M. Glover, High-resolution echo-planar imaging at 3.0T, Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2 (1994), pp. 241-245.
5. R.B. Buxton, Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
6. V.D. Calhoun, M.C. Stevens, G.D. Pearson, and K. Kiehl, fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induces amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms, NeuroImage 22 (2004), pp. 252-257.
7. P. Ciuciu, J.-B. Poline, G. Marrelec, J. Idier, C. Pallier, and H. Benali, Unsupervised robust nonparametric estimation of the hemodynamic response function for any fMRI experiment, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22 (2003), pp. 1235-1251.
8. M.S. Cohen, Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear system methods, NeuroImage 6 (1997), pp. 93-103.
9. N. Crellin, T. Hastie, and I.M. Johnstone, In the discussion of non-linear Fourier time series analysis for human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging by N.Lange and S.L. Zeger, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 46 (1997), pp. 22-23.
10. K.J. Friston, P. Jezzard, and R. Turner, Analysis of functional MRI time series, Hum. Brain Mapp. 1 (1994), pp. 153-171.
11. K.J. Friston, C.F.R. Turner, and R.S.J. Frackowiak, Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI, NeuroImage 2 (1995), pp. 157-165.
12. K.J. Friston, A.P. Holmes, J.-B. Poline, P.J. Gransby, S.C.R. Williams, R.S.J. Frackowiak, and R. Turner, Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited, NeuroImage 2 (1995), pp. 45-53.
13. K.J. Friston, J. Ashburner, C. Frith, J.D. Heather, and R.S.J. Frackowiak, Spatial registration and normalization of images, Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1995), pp. 165-189.
14. K.J. Friston, P. Fletcher, O. Josephs, A. Holmes, M. Rugg, and R. Turner, Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses, NeuroImage 7 (1998), pp. 30-40.
15. K.J. Friston, O. Josephs, G. Rees, and R. Turner, Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI, Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998), pp. 41-52.
16. C.R. Genovese, A Bayesian time-course model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data (with comments), J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95 (2000), pp. 691-719.
17. R. Gibbons, N. Lazar, D. Bhaumik, S. Sclove, H. Chen, K. Thulborn, J. Sweeney, K. Hur, and D. Patterson, Estimation and classification of fMRI hemodynamic response patterns, Neuroimage 22 (2004), pp. 804-814.
18. G.H. Glover, Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related fMRI, NeuroImage 9 (1999), pp. 416-429.
19. C. Guotte, F.Å. Nielsen, and L.K. Hansen, Modeling the haemodynamic response in fMRI using smooth FIR filters, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19 (2000), pp. 1188-1201.
20. D.A. Hall, M.S. Gonçalves, S. Smith, P. Jezzard, M.P. Haggard, and J. Kornak, A method for determining venous contribution to BOLD contrast sensory activation, Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 (2002), pp. 695-706.
21. D.A. Handwerker, J.M. Ollinger, and M. D'Esposito,Variation of the BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses, NeuroImage 21 (2004), pp. 1639-1651.
22. M. Harms and J. Melcher, Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set, Hum. Brain Mapp. 20 (2003), pp. 168-183.
23. R.N.A. Henson, C.J. Price, M.D. Rugg, R. Turner, and K.J. Friston, Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations, NeuroImage 15 (2002), pp. 83-97.
24. F. Kruggel and D.Y. von Cramon, Temporal properties of the hemodynamic response in functional MRI, Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 (1999), pp. 259-271.
25. N. Lange and S.L. Zeger, Non-linear Fourier time series analysis for human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 46 (1997), pp. 1-29.
26. A.T. Lee, G.H. Glover, and C.H. Meyer, Discrimination of large venous vessels in time-course spiral blood-oxygenlevel-dependent magnetic resonance functional neuroimaging, Magn. Reson. Med. 33 (1995), pp. 745-754.
27. C.H. Liao, K.J. Worsley, J.-B. Poline, J.A.D. Aston, G.H. Duncan, and A.C. Evans, Estimating the delay of the fMRI response, NeuroImage 16 (2002), pp. 593-606.
28. M.A. Lindquist and T.D. Wager, Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach, Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (2007), pp. 764-784.
29. D. Malonek and A. Grinvald, Interactions between electrical activity and cortical microcirculation revealed by imaging spectroscopy: implications for functional brain mapping, Science 272 (1996), pp. 551-554.
30. F.M. Meizen, L. Maccotta, J.M. Ollinger, S.E. Petersen, and R.L. Buckner, Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing, NeuroImage 11 (2000), pp. 735-759.
31. J.A. Nelder and R. Mead, A simplex algorithm for function minimization, Comput. J. 7 (1965), pp. 308-313.
32. P.L. Purdon, V. Solo, R.M. Weisskoff, and E.N. Brown, Locally regularized spatiotemporal modeling and model comparison for functional MRI, NeuroImage 14 (2001), pp. 912-923.
33. J.C. Rajapakse, F. Kruggel, J.M. Maisog, and D.Y. von Cramon, Modeling hemodynamic response for analysis of functional MRI time-series, Hum. Brain Mapp. 6 (1998), pp. 283-300.
34. M.D. Robson, J.L. Dorosz, and J.C. Gore, Measurement of the temporal fMRI response of the human auditory cortex to trains of tones, NeuroImage 7 (1998), pp. 185-198.
35. Z.S. Saad, K.M. Ropellaand, R. Cox, and E.A. DeYoe, Analysis and use of fMRI response delays, Hum. Brain Mapp. 13 (2001), pp. 74-93.
36. G.A.F. Seber and C.J. Wild, Nonlinear Regression, Wiley, NewYork, 1989.
37. M.W. Woolrich, T.E.J. Behrens, and S.M. Smith, Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using variational bayes, NeuroImage 21 (2004), pp. 1748-1761.
38. K.J. Worsley, C.H. Liao, J. Aston,V. Petere, G.H. Duncan, F. Morales, and A.C. Evans, A general statistical analysis of fMRI data, NeuroImage 15 (2002), pp. 1-15.