Rejecting renewables: The socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States

Energy Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 4500-4513

  Sovacool, Benjamin K ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Renewable electricity; Renewable energy; Renewable power

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS OWNERS; CLEANER TECHNOLOGIES; CONVENTIONAL POWER PLANTS; CULTURAL ASPECTS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; NOT GIVEN; POWER SYSTEMS; PRICE SIGNALS; RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RENEWABLES; SOCIOTECHNICAL; SYSTEM OPERATOR; UTILITY MANAGERS;

BIOMASS; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ENERGY POLICY; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; PUBLIC UTILITIES;

ELECTRICITY;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; POWER PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 70449436518     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.073     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alderfer, Brent., Starrs, Thomas J., 2000. Making connections: case studies of interconnection barriers and their impact on distributed power projects, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/SR-200-28053.
2. Allen A. The legal impediments to distributed generation. Energy Law Journal 23 (2002) 505-523
3. Belk R., Painter J., and Semenik R. Preferred solutions to the energy crisis as a function of causal attributions. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (1981) 306-312 (December)
4. Bennett P.D., and Moore N.K. Consumers' preferences for alternative energy conservation policies: a trade-off analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (1981) 313-321 (December)
5. Bijker W., and Law J. General introduction. In: Bijker W., and Law J. (Eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Brehm JackW. Postdecision challenges in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52 (1956) 384-389
7. Committee on Climate Change Science and Technology Integration, 2009. Strategies for the Commercialization and Deployment of Greenhouse Gas Intensity-Reducing Technologies and Practices (Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, January, DOE/PI-0007).
8. Douglas M., and Isherwood B. The World of Goods (1979), Basic Books, New York
9. Dunlap R.E., and Olsen M.E. Hard-path versus soft-path advocates: a study of energy activists. Policy Studies Journal 13 2 (1984) 413-428 (December)
10. Edwards P.N. Infrastructure and modernity: force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In: Misa T.J., Brey P., and Feenberg A. (Eds). Modernity and Technology (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA 185-226
11. Gately D. Individual discount rates: comment. The Bell Journal of Economics 11 1 (1980) 373-374 (Spring)
12. Geller Howard., and Attali Sophie. The Experience with Energy Efficiency Policies and Programs in IEA Countries (2005), International Energy Agency, Paris (August)
13. Gottlieb David., and Matre Marc. Sociological Dimensions of the Energy Crisis: A Follow-Up Study (1976), University of Houston, The Energy Institute (April 30)
14. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (1968) 1243-1248
15. Hayes E.T. Energy resources available to the US, 1985-2000. In: Kranzberg M., Hall T.A., and Scheiber J.L. (Eds). Energy and the Way We Live (1980), Boyd & Fraser Publishing, San Francisco 34-43
16. Henion II K.E., and Kinnear T.C. The Ecologically Concerned Consumer and Locus of Control. In: Henion II K.E., and Kinnear T.C. (Eds). Ecological Marketing (1976), American Marketing Association, Chicago 131-144
17. Hirsh R.F. Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Hirsh R.F. Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Hirsh R.F. Power struggle: changing momentum in the restructured american electric utility system. L'Electricite en Reseaux: Networks of Power (2004), Victories Editions, Paris
20. Holdren J.P., et al. Powerful Partnerships: The Federal Role of International Cooperation on Energy Innovation (1999), Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC
21. Hughes T.P. Technological momentum in history: hydrogenation in Germany 1898-1933. Past and Present 44 1 (1969) 106-132
22. Hughes ThomasP. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 (1983), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
23. Hughes T.P. The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker W.E., Hughes, and Pinch T.J. (Eds). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 52
24. Hummel C.F., Levitt L., and Loomis R.J. Perceptions of the energy crisis: who is blamed and how do citizens react to environment-lifestyle trade-offs?. Environment and Behavior 10 (1978) 37-88
25. International Energy Agency, 2009. Energy Technology RD&D 2008 Edition. International Energy Agency, Paris
26. Koomey J.G. Energy Efficiency in New Office Buildings: An Investigation of Market Failures and Corrective Polices (1990), University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (Doctoral Dissertation)
27. Latour B. The powers of association. In: Law J. (Ed). Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Law J. Constructive technology assessment and technology dynamics: the case of clean technologies. Science, Technology, and Human Values 17 1 (1992) 38 (Winter, Quoted in Johan W. Schot)
29. Lipartito K. Picturephone and the Information age: the social meaning of failure. Technology & Culture 44 1 (2003) 50-81
30. MacKenzie D. Missile accuracy: a case study in the social process of technological change. In: Bijker W., Hughes T.P., and Pinch T. (Eds). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (1987), MIT Press, London
31. Marshall A. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume (1890), The Macmillan Company, New York (1920)
32. Melosi M.V. Coping With Abundance: Energy and Environment in Industrial America (1985), Knopf, New York
33. Misa T.J. How machines make history, and how historians (and others) help them to do so. Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 3/4 (1988) 318 (Summer/Autumn)
34. Mishan E.J. The Costs of Economic Growth (1967), Praeger, New York
35. Mort M. Building the Trident Network: A Study of the Enrollment of People, Knowledge, and Machines (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
36. Murray J.R., Minor M.J., Bradbum N.M., Conerman R.F., Frankel M., and Pisarski A. Evolution of public response to the energy crisis. Science 19 (1974) 257-263
37. National Research Council. Energy Choices in a Democratic Society (1980), National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC
38. Newman D.K., and Day D. The American Energy Consumer (1975), Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA
39. Noland M.C. Solar energy: practice and prognosis. In: Kranzberg M., Hall T.A., and Scheiber J.L. (Eds). Energy and the Way We Live (1980), Boyd & Fraser Publishing, San Francisco 372
40. Nye D.E. Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880-1940 (1990), MIT Press, London
41. Nye D.E. Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies (1999), MIT Press, London
42. Pasqualetti M.J., Gipe P., and Righter R.W. Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World (2002), Academic Press, New York pp. 10-12
43. Pasqualetti M.J. Wind power: obstacles and opportunities. Environment 46 7 (2004) 22-31 (September)
44. Perrow C. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (1984), Basic Books, New York
45. Pigou A.C. The Economics of Welfare (1920), MacMillan and Company, London (1924)
46. [REN21] Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. 2008. Renewables 2007: Global Status Report (Paris: REN21 Secretariat, 2008).
47. [REN21] Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. 2009. Renewables Global Status Report: 2009 Update (Paris: REN21 Secretariat, May).
48. Rendon J. In search of savings, companies turn to the sun. The New York Times (2003) B12 (October 12)
49. Sanstad A.H., Blumstein C., and Soft S.E. How high are option values in energy-efficiency investments. Energy Policy 23 9 (1995) 739-743
50. Schipper Lee. Energy Conservation: Its Nature, Hidden Benefits, and Hidden Barriers (1975), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (June 1, 1975, UCID 3725 ERG 2)
51. Schurr S.H., Darmstadter J., Perry H., Ramsay W., and Russell M. Energy in America's Future: the Choices before Us (1979), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
52. Shippee G. Energy consumption and conservation psychology: a review and conceptual analysis. Environmental Management 4 4 (1980) 297-314
53. Simon H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 1 (1955) 99-118 (February)
54. Simon H.A. Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review 69 4 (1979) 493-513 (September)
55. Smil V. Energy in World History (1994), Westview, New York
56. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2006. The power production paradox: revealing the socio-technical impediments to distributed generation technologies, Blacksburg, VA: PhD Dissertation, available at 〈http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04202006-172936/〉.
57. Sovacool B.K., and Cooper C. Big is beautiful: the case for federal leadership on a renewable portfolio standard. Electricity Journal 20 4 (2007) 48-50
58. Sovacool B.K. Renewable energy: economically sound, politically difficult. Electricity Journal 21 5 (2008) 18-29 (June)
59. Sovacool B.K. The problem with the 'portfolio approach' in american energy policy. Policy Sciences 41 3 (2008) 245-261 (September)
60. Sovacool B.K. The Dirty Energy Dilemma: What's Blocking Clean Power in the United States (2008), Praegar, Westport, CT
61. Stavros R. Distributed generation: last big battle for state regulators?. Public Utilities Fortnightly 137 (1999) 34-43 (October 15)
62. Stern P.C., and Aronson E. Energy Use: The Human Dimension (1984), Freeman & Company, New York
63. Tienda M., and Aborampah O.-M. Energy-related adaptations in low-income nonmetropolitan Wisconsin counties. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (1981) 265-270 (December)
64. US Department of Energy, 2008. Behavioral Research Workshop: Residential Buildings Energy Efficiency Draft Summary Report. Office of Policy and International Affairs of the US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, February 26.
65. US Energy Information Administration. Net Generation by Energy Source: Total (All Sectors), 1995 through February 2009 (2009), US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
66. US Energy Information Administration. Net Generation by Other Renewables: Total (All Sectors), 1995 through February 2009 (2009), US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
67. US Government Accountability Office. Department of Energy: Key Challenges Remain for Developing and Deploying Advanced Energy Technologies to Meet Future Needs (2006), US GAO, Washington, DC (December, GAO-07-106)
68. Vernon R. An interpretation. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 104 4 (1975) 1-14 (Fall)
69. Williams J.C. Strictly business: notes on deregulating electricity. Technology & Culture 42 (2001) 626-630
70. Winner L. Energy regimes and the ideology of efficiency. In: Daniels G.H., and Rose M.H. (Eds). Energy and Transport: Historical Perspectives on Policy Issues (1982), Sage Publications, London 261-277
71. Wiser, Ryan., 2007. Wind Power and the Production Tax Credit: An Overview of Research Results, Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee, March 29, 2007.
72. Woodhouse E.J. Is large-scale military R&D defensible theoretically?. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 4 (1990) 442-460 (Autumn)
73. Yakubovich V., Granovetter M., and McGuire P. Electric charges: the social construction of rate systems. Theory and Society 34 (2005) 579-612