A unified approach for analyzing exchangeable binary data with applications to developmental toxicity studies

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 2580-2604

  Dang, Xin ^a   Keeton, Stephine Lena ^b   Peng, Hanxiang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beta binomial; Binomial mixture; Complete monotonicity; Exchangeability; Link function

Indexed keywords

2,4,5 TRICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; ESTRADIOL;

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; ABNORMALITIES, DRUG-INDUCED; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG TOXICITY; FETAL DEATH; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MICE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 70449433093     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3638     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Frey R, McNeil AJ. Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk. Journal of Risk 2003; 6:59-92.
2. Kendall DG. On finite and infinite sequences of exchangeable events. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 1967; 2:319-327.
3. George EO, Bowman D. A full likelihood procedure for analyzing exchangeable binary data. Biometrics 1995; 51:512-523.
4. Chow YS, Teicher H. Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales. Springer: Berlin, 2003.
5. Conaway MR. A random effects models for binary data. Biometrics 1990; 46:317-328.
6. Fanaroff AA. A controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin to reduce nosocomial infections in very-low-birth- weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330:1107-1113.
7. Collett D. Modelling Binary Data. Chapman & Hall, CRC: London, Boca Raton, 2003.
8. Joe H. Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman & Hall: London, 1997.
9. Neuhaus JM. Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1992; 1:249-273.
10. Williams D. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 1975; 31:949-952.
11. Kupper L, Haseman J. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 1978; 34:69-76. (Pubitemid 8316898)
12. Stiratelli R, Laird N, Ware JH. Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics 1984; 40:961-971.
13. Ochi Y, Prentice RL. Likelihood inference in a correlated probit regression model. Biometrika 1984; 71:531-543.
14. Coull BA, Agresti A. Random effects modeling of multiple binomial response using the multivariate binomial logit-normal distribution. Biometrics 2000; 56:73-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00073.x. (Pubitemid 30165092)
15. Follmann DA, Lambert D. Generalizing logistic regression by nonparametric mixing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989; 84:295-300.
16. Williams D. Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Applied Statistics 1982; 31:144-148.
17. Liang KY, Qaqish B, Zeger S. Multivariate regression analyses for categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1992; 54:3-40.
18. Lipsitz SR, Laird NM, Harrington DP. Generalized estimation equations for correlated binary data: using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 1991; 78:153-160. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/78.1.153.
19. Kuk AYC. A litter-based approach to risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies via a power family of completely monotone functions. Applied Statistics 2004; 53:369-386. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9876.2003.05369.x.
20. Mislevy RJ. Estimation of latent group effects. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1985; 80:993-997.
21. Stefanescu C, Turnbull BW. Likelihood inference for exchangeable binary data with varying cluster sizes. Biometrics 2003; 59:18-24. DOI: 10.1111/1541-0420.00003. (Pubitemid 36523103)
22. Xu J, Prorok CP. Modelling and analyzing exchangeable binary data with random cluster sizes. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:2401-2416. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1527. (Pubitemid 36949662)
23. Altham P. Two generalizations of binomial distribution. Applied Statistics 1978; 27:162-167.
24. Brooks SP, Morgan B, Ridout M, Pack S. Finite mixture models for proportions. Biometrics 1997; 53:1097-1115.
25. Feller W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. Wiley: New York, 1971.
26. Kingman JFC. The 1977 Wald memorial lectures: uses of exchangeability. Annals of Probability 1978; 6:183-197.
27. Prentice R. Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation. Biometrics 1988; 44:1033-1048. (Pubitemid 19026036)
28. Widder D. The Laplace Transforms. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1941.
29. Zhu Y, Krewski D, Ross WH. Dose-response models for correlated multinomial data from developmental toxicity studies. Applied Statistics 1994; 43:583-598. (Pubitemid 24818313)
30. Brooks SP. On Bayesian analysis and finite mixtures for proportions. Statistics and Computing 2001; 11:179-190. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008983500916.
31. Gaylor DW, Razzaghi M. Process of building biologically based dose-response models for developmental defects. Teratology 1992; 46:573-581. (Pubitemid 23018728)
32. Cook D, Weisberg S. Applied Regression Including Computing and Graphics. Wiley: New York, 1999.
33. Srivastava MS, Wu Y. Local efficiency of moment estimators in Beta-binomial model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 1993; 22:257-261.