Editorial: The so what factor: Statistical versus cinical significance

International Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 773-774

  Stapleton, C ^a   Scott, M A ^a   Atkinson, Greg ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SPORTS MEDICINE;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPORTS MEDICINE;

EID: 70449416048     PISSN: 01724622     EISSN: 14393964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1241216     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Batterham AM, Atkinson G. How big does my sample need to be? A primer on the murky world of sample size estimation. Phys Ther Sport 2005 6 153-163
2. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000
3. Carver RP. The case against statistical significance testing. Harv Educ Rev 1978 48 378-399
4. Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Physiol Genomics 2004 18 249-251 (Pubitemid 39319506)
5. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Estimating with confidence. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, eds. Statistics with Confidence Bristol: BMJ Books 2000 3-5
6. Hopkins W, Batterham AM. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2006 1 50-57
7. Houle TT, Stump DA. Statistical significance versus clinical significance. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008 12 5-6