Perceived astringency in wine: A predictive model

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 754, Issue , 2007, Pages 523-532

  Monteleone, E ^a   Dinnella, C ^a   Condelli, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

In vitro assay; Mucin; Nephelometry; Polyphenols; Proteins; Sensory evaluation; Wine composition

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE;

EID: 70449392284     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.754.70     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Braslin, P.A.S., Gilmore, M.M., Beauchamp, G.K. and Green, B.G. 1993. Psychophysical evidence that oral astringency is a tactile sensation. Chem. Senses, 18, 405-417.
2. Carvalho, E., Mateus, N. and de Freitas, V. 2004. Flow nephelometric analysis of proteintannin interactions. Analytica Chimica Acta. 513, 97-101.
3. Condelli, N., Dinnella, C., Sabia, L. and Monteleone, E. 2005. Prediction of pH and ethanol content effect on perceived astringency induced by phenolic compounds. Poster presentation at 6th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 7-11 August 2005, Harrowgate UK.
4. Condelli, N., Dinnella, C., Cerone, A., Monteleone, E. and Bertuccioli, M. 2006. Prediction of perceived astringency induced by phenolic compounds II: criteria for panel selection and preliminary applications on wine samples. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 2, 215-223.
5. Edelmann, A. and Lendl, B. 2002. Towards the optical tongue: flow-through sensing of tannin-protein interactions based on FTIR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 14741-14747.
6. Gawell, R., Oberholster, A. and Francis, I.L. 2000. A "Mouth -feel Wheel": terminology for communicating the mouthfeel characteristics of red wine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 6, 203-207.
7. Glories, Y. 1978. Recherches sur la matière colorant des vins rouges. PhD Thesis University of Bordeaux II.
8. Horne, J., Hayes, J. and Lawless, H.T. 2002. Turbidity as a measure of salivary proteins reactions with astringent substances. Chem. Senses, 27, 653-659.
9. Monteleone, E., Condelli, N., Dinnella, C. and Bertuccioli, M. 2004. Prediction of perceived astringency induced by phenolic compounds. Food Quality and Preference, 15 (7-8) 761-770.
10. Prinz, J.F. and Lucas, P.W. 2000. Saliva tannin interactions J. Oral Rehabilitation, 27, 991-994.
11. Riou, V., Vernhet, A., Doco, T. and Moutounet, M. 2001. Aggregation of grape seed tannins in model wine : effect of wine polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids, 16, 17-23.
12. Sarni-Manchado, P., Cheynier, V. and Moutounet, M. 1999. Interaction of grape seed tannins with salivary proteins. J.Agric.Food Chem., 47, 42-47.
13. Sowalsky, R.A. and Noble, A.C. 1998. Comparison of the effects of concentration, pH and anion species on astringency and sourness of organic acids. Chemical Senses, 23, 343-349.
14. Vidal, S., Leigh, F., Noble, A., Kwiatkowski, M., Cheynier, V. and Waters, E. 2004. Taste and mouth-feel properties of different types of tannin-like polyphenolic compounds and anthocyanins in wine. Analytica Chimica Acta, 513, 57-65.