Bayesian inference for the stereotype regression model: Application to a case-control study of prostate cancer

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 25, 2009, Pages 3139-3157

  Ahn, Jaeil ^a   Mukherjee, Bhramar ^a   Banerjee, Mousumi ^a   Cooney, Kathleen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Case control study; Disease sub classification

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGE; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER STAGING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METROPOLIS HASTINGS ALGORITHM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROSTATE CANCER; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 70449379275     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3693     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson JA. Regression and ordered categorical variable. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1984; 46:1-30.
2. Greenland S. Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13:1665-1677. (Pubitemid 24275845)
3. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol.1 - The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. IARC Scientific Publications: Lyon, France, 1980.
4. Mukherjee B, Liu I, Sinha S. Analysis of matched case-control data with ordinal disease states: possible choices and comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26(17):3240-3257. (Pubitemid 47039784)
5. Kuss O. On the estimation of the stereotype regression model. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006; 50:1877-1890.
6. Johnson VE, Albert JH. Ordinal Data Modeling. Springer: Berlin, 1999.
7. Congdon P. Bayesian Models for Categorical Data. Wiley: New York, 2005.
8. Kottas A, Müller P, Quintana F. Nonparametric Bayesian modeling for multivariate ordinal data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2005; 14:610-625. (Pubitemid 41442152)
9. Sinha S, Mukherjee B, Ghosh M. Bayesian semiparametric modeling for matched case-control studies with multiple disease states. Biometrics 2004; 60:41-49. (Pubitemid 38392614)
10. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 2002.
11. Mccullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall: London, 1983.
12. Cornfield J. Joint dependence of risk of coronary heart disease on serum cholesterol and systolic blood pressure: a discriminant function analysis. Federation Proceedings 1962; 21:58-61.
13. Mukherjee B, Ahn J, Liu I, Rathouz PJ, Sanchez BN. On elimination of nuisance parameters in a stratified proportional odds model by amalgamating conditional likelihoods. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:4950-4971.
14. Lall R, Campbell MJ, Walters SJ, Morgan K. MRC CFAS Co-operative. A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2002; 11:49-67. (Pubitemid 34201831)
15. Yee TW, Hastie TJ. Reduced-rank vector generalized linear models. Statistical Modeling 2003; 3:15-41.
16. McCullagh P. Discussion of professor Anderson's paper. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1984; 46:1-30.
17. Haberman SJ. Tests for independence in two-way contingency tables based on canonical correlation and linear-by-linear interaction. The Annals of Statistics 1981; 9:1178-1186.
18. Hanfelt JJ, Liang KY. Approximate likelihood ratios for general estimating functions. Biometrika 1995; 82: 461-477.
19. Chen H, Chen J, Kalbfleisch JD. A modified likelihood ratio test for homogeneity in finite mixture models. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2001; 63:19-29. (Pubitemid 33392460)
20. Carlin BP, Louis TA. Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall: London, 2000.
21. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall: London, 2004.
22. Rice KM. Equivalence between conditional and mixture approaches to the Rasch model and matched case-control studies, with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99:510-522.
23. Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1984; 6:721-741. (Pubitemid 15453722)
24. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM. Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1990; 85:398-409.
25. Gilks WR, Wild P. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Applied Statistics 1992; 41:337-348.
26. Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with Discussion). Statistical Science 1992; 7:457-472.
27. Sarma AV, Schottenfield D. Prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States: 1981-2001. Seminars in Urologic Oncology 2002; 20:3-9.
28. Cooney KA, Strawderman MS, Wojno KJ, Doerr KM, Taylor A, Alcser KH, Heeringa SG, Taylor JM, Wei JT, Montie JE, Schottenfield D. Age-specific distribution of serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based study of African-American men. Urology 2001; 57:91-96. (Pubitemid 32065826)
29. Jewett HJ. The present status of radical prostatectomy for stages A and B prostatic cancer. Urologic Clinics of North America 1975; 2:105-124.
30. Prostate IN. American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (6th edn). Springer: New York, NY, 2002; 309-316.
31. Montie JE. Staging of prostate cancer: current TNM classification and future prospects for prognostic factors. Cancer 1995; 75:1814-1818.