Radiographic assessment of biomechanical parameters following hip resurfacing and cemented total hip arthroplasty

HIP International

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 251-256

  Robb, Curtis A ^a,b   Harris, Richard ^a   O'Dwyer, Kevin ^a   Aslam, Nadim ^a  

^a WORCESTERSHIRE ROYAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Hip resurfacing; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUP OFFSET; FEMALE; FEMORAL OFFSET; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP RESURFACING; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG LENGTH; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; MALE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 70449371815     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900311     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Edeen J, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH. Clinical significance of leg length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 1995; 24: 347-51.
2. Rosler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 23-7.
3. Frieberg O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine 1983; 8: 643-51.
4. Bose W. Accurate limb-length equalisation during total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 2000; 23: 433-6.
5. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 388: 125-34.
6. McGrory B, Morrey B, Cahalan T, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 865-9.
7. Girard J, Lavigne M, Venditolli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip. A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 721-26.
8. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 163-6.
9. Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A. Results of a method of leg-length equalisation for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 159-64.
10. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. A multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 282-88.
11. Bland J, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurment. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
12. Ranawat CS. Hip arthroplasty: Post operative management problems. The pants too short the leg too long! Orthopaedics 1999; 22: 845-6.
13. Williamson JA, Reckling FW. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1988; 236: 199.
14. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1979.
15. Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N et al. A 12 to18 year radiographic follow up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: The role of the centre of rotation. Clin Orthop 1993; 296: 140-7.
16. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Wear of the cup in the Charnley LFA in the young patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86-B: 498-503.
17. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip: A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61-A: 639-652.
18. Schmalzried TP, Shepherd EF, Dorey FJ, Jackson WO, dela Rosa M, Fa'vae F, McKellop HA, McClung CD, Martell JM, Moreland JR, Amstutz HC. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop 2000; 381: 36-46.
19. Davey JR, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH. Femoral component offset. It's affect on strain in bone cement. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 23-26.
20. Hodge WA, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6: 229-235.
21. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 40-6.
22. Moonot PB, Matthews DJ, CroninMD. Electronic letter. J Bone Joint Surg 8 March 2006. http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/eletters/87-B/2/163.
23. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 88-B: 997-1002.
24. Moonot P, Singh PJ, Cronin MD, Kalairajah YE, Kavanagh TG, Field RE. Birmingham hip resurfacing: Is acetabular bone conserved? J Bone Joint Surg 2008; 90-B: 319-323.