Flowable composites for bonding orthodontic retainers

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 195-200

  Tabrizi, Sama ^a   Salemis, Elio ^b   Usumez, Serdar ^c  

^a Private Practice   (United Arab Emirates)

^b Private Practice   (Greece)

^c GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bonding; Fixed retainer; Flowable composite; Physical property; Retention

Indexed keywords

FILTEK SUPREME; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; RELIANCE LIGHT BOND; RELIANCE RESIN CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 70449369361     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/033007-155.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34: 849-853.
2. Kneirim RW. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43: 218-219.
3. Zachrisson BU. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995; 29: 39-48.
4. Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman A. Effect of a fast halogen and a plasma arc light on the surface hardness of orthodontic adhesives for lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 641-648.
5. Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Gunduz B. Degree of conversion of two lingual retainer adhesives cured with different light sources. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 173-179.
6. Elaut J, Asscherickx K, Vande Vannet B, Wehrbein H. Flowable composites for bonding lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 2002; 36: 597-598.
7. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69: 516-521.
8. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998; 129: 567-577.
9. Behle C. Flowable composites: properties and applications. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10: 347-350.
10. Bonilla ED, Yashar M, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 261-267.
11. Labela R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999; 15: 128-137.
12. Moon PC, Tabassian MS, Culbreath TE. Flow characteristics and film thickness of flowable resin composites. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 248-253.
13. Geserick M, Wichelhaus A. A color-reactivated flowable composite for bonding lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 2004; 38: 165-166.
14. Geserick M, Ball J, Wichelhaus A. Bonding fiber-reinforced lingual retainers with color-reactivating flowable composite. J Clin Orthod. 2004; 38: 560-562.
15. Uysal T, Sari Z, Demir A. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? Angle Orthod. 2003; 74: 697-702.
16. Malkoc S, Demir A, Sengun A, Ozer F. The effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etching. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 484-488.
17. Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111: 67-74.
18. Andenwalla ST, Attarzadeh F. The bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Br J Orthod. 1986; 13: 159-163.
19. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108: 207-213.
20. Radlanski RJ, Zain ND. Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer: a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthop. 2004; 65: 321-335.
21. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1979; 2: 171-178.
22. Schulz RP, Mayhew RB, Oesterle LJ, Pierson WP. Bond strengths of three resin systems used with brackets and embedded wire attachments. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87: 75-80.