The Mayo cementless femoral component in active patients with osteoarthritis

HIP International

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 206-210

  Goebel, Dietmar ^a   Schultz, Wolfgang ^b  

^a Orthopaedic Clinic Donaueschingen   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cementless stem; Hip arthroplasty Mayo; Young patient

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REHABILITATION CARE; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 70449369176     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900303     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ansari A, Jones S, Hashemi-Nejad A, Catteral A: Varus proximal femoral osteotomy for hip dysplasia in adults. Hip International 2008; 18: 200-206.
2. Langdon IJ, Bannister GC: Cemented hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years: 16-24 year results. Hip International 1999; 9: 151-153.
3. Lubinus P, Klauseer W: Der Lubinus Schaft. In: Wetzel R (eds.): Verankerungsprinzipien in der Hüftendoprothetik. Steinkopff - Darmstadt, 2001: 73-78.
4. Smith SE, Estok DM, Harris WH: 20 -year experience with cemented primary and conversions total hip arthroplasty using so-called second generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 263-273.
5. Sedel L, Nizard RS, Kerboull L, Witvoed J: Aluminia-aluminia hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin Orthop 1994; 298: 175-183.
6. Tennent TD, Goddard NJ: Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the young patient: Results of a national survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 33-38.
7. Vervest TMJS, Anderson PG: The Zweymüller cementless total hip prosthesis in patients aged 50 years and younger. Hip International 2005; 15: 1-11.
8. McAndrew AR, Khaleel A, Bloomfield MD, Aweid A: A District Hospital's experience of hip resurfacing. Hip International 2007; 17: 1-3.
9. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA: Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip International 2008; 18: 212-219.
10. Chirodian N, Saw T, Villar R: Results of hybrid total hip replacement and resurfacing - Is there a difference? Hip International 2004; 14: 169-173.
11. Merle d'Aubigne R, Postel M: Functional results of arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1954; 36-A: 451-455.
12. Esslinger T: Klinische Erfahrungen mit der Mayo Hüftendprothese: Orthopädisches Symposium 2001; Halle.
13. Herberts P, Machau H: Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review oft he Swedish THR Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 354-359.
14. Corner JA, Rawoot A, Parmar HV: the thrust plate prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical and radiological outcome with minimum 5-year follow-up. Hip international 2008; 18: 88-94.
15. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P: Metal on Metal surface replacement of the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1996; 329: S89-98.
16. Wirtz DC: Grundprinzipien erfolgreicher zementfreier Hüftgradschaftprothesen in Europa. In: das Bicontact Hüftendoprothesensystem 1987-2007. Weller S, Braun A, Eingartner C, Maurer F, Weise K, Winter E, Volkmann R (eds.); 2007: 6-11.