Can you be bothered? The role of participant motivation in the valuation of species conservation measures

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 519-534

  Lienhoop, Nele ^a   Fischer, Anke ^b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Butterflies; Conservation; Market Stall; Motivation; Stated preference techniques; Validity; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; SPECIES CONSERVATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 70449368773     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560902868405     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ajzen, I., Brown, T.C., and Rosenthal, L.H., 1996. Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of environmental economics and management, 30, 43-57.
2. Alvarez-Farizo, B., et al., 2007. Choice modeling at the 'market stall': individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation. Ecological economics, 60 (4), 743-751.
3. Boyle, K.J., 1989. Commodity specification and the framing of contingent valuation questions. Land economics, 65, 57-63.
4. Chaiken, S., 1987. The heuristic model of persuasion. In: M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson, and C.P. Herman, eds. Social influence: the Ontario symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3-39.
5. Chilton, S.M. and Hutchinson, W.G., 2003. A qualitative examination of how respondents in a contingent valuation study rationalise their WTP responses to an increase in the quantity of the environmental good. Journal of economic psychology, 24 (1), 65-75.
6. Clark, J., Burgess, J., and Harrison, C.M., 2000. I struggled with this money business: respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecological economics, 33, 45-62.
7. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20, 37-46.
8. Ekman, P.,1988. Gesichtsausdruck und Gefühl:20Jahre Forschung von Paul Ekman. Paderborn: Junfermann.
9. Fischer, A. and Menzel, S., 2005. Die Eignung von Gutern fur Zahlungsbereitschaftsanalysen. In: R. Marggraf et al., eds. Ökonomische Bewertung bei umwelterelevanten Entscheidungen. Marburg: Metropolis, 113-148.
10. Fischer, A. and Hanley, N., 2007. Analysing decision behaviour in stated preference surveys: a consumer psychological approach. Ecological economics, 61, 303-314.
11. Fischer, A. and Van der Wal, R., 2007. Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird: the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. Biological conservation, 135, 256-267.
12. Gravelle, H. and Rees, R., 1993. Microeconomics. London: Prentice Hall.
13. Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P., 1993. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 7, 177-197.
14. Greve, W. and Wentura, D.,1997. Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung. Eine Einführung. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
15. Hanley, N., Shogren, J., and White, B., 2007. Environmental economics in theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.L., 1992. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of environmental economics and management, 22, 57-70.
17. Kenyon, W., Nevin, C., and Hanley, N., 2003. Enhancing environmental decision-making using citizens juries. Local environment, 8, 221-232.
18. Krosnick, J.A., 1991. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied cognitive psychology, 5, 213-236.
19. Lienhoop, N. and MacMillan, D., 2007. Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land use policy, 24 (1), 289-295.
20. Littell, R.C., et al., 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
21. MacMillan, D., et al., 2002. Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches. Ecological economics, 43,49-59.
22. MacMillan, D.C., Hanley, N., and Lienhoop, N., 2006. Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preference engine? Ecological economics, 60, 299-307.
23. Mayring, P., 1993. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz.
24. Mayring, P., Glaser-Zikuda, M., and Ziegelbauer, S., 2005. Auswertung von Videoaufnahmen mit Hilfe der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse - ein Beispiel aus der Unterrichtsforschung. Medienpädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung [online]. Available from: www.medienpaed.com [Accessed 6 March 2008]
25. McElroy, T. and Seta, J., 2003. Framing effects: an analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of experimental social psychology, 39, 610-617.
26. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T., 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
27. Payne, J., Bettman, J., and Johnson, E., 1993. The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Petty, R. and Cacioppo, J., 1986. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
29. Ratcliff, D., 2003. Video Methods in Qualitative Research. In: P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes, and L. Yardley, eds. Qualitative research in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 113-130.
30. Sagoff, M., 1998. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: a look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological economics, 24, 213-230.
31. Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk, L.L., 1991. Consumer behavior. London: Prentice Hall.
32. Spash, C., 2002. Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: coral reef biodiversity. Journal of economic psychology, 23, 665-687.
33. Spash, C. and Hanley, N., 1995. Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation. Ecological economics, 12, 191-208.
34. Stahlberg, D. and Frey, D., 1993. Das Elaboration-likelihood-modell von Petty und Cacioppo. In: D. Frey and M. Irle, eds. Kognitive Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Bern: Huber, 327-360.
35. Ulich, D. and Mayring, P., 2003. Psychologie der Emotionen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
36. Watzold, F., Leinhoop, N., Drechsler, M., and Settele, J., 2008. Optimal conservation when costs and benefits of agri-environmental programmes are heterogeneous in space and time. Ecological economics, 68, 295-305.
37. Wilson, M.A. and Howarth, R.B., 2002. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological economics, 41, 431-443.