OGO: An ontological approach for integrating knowledge about orthology

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 10, 2009, Pages

  Miñarro Gimenez, Jose A ^a   Madrid, Marisa ^b   Fernandez Breis, Jesualdo T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; INFORMATION RESOURCE; INTEGRATED INFORMATIONS; KNOWLEDGE BASE; ONTOLOGICAL APPROACH; ONTOLOGICAL LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC LANGUAGE;

ONTOLOGY;

GENE PRODUCT;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; ORTHOLOGY;

EID: 70449367155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S10-S13     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Altman R, Valencia A, Miyano S, Ranganathan S. Challenges for intelligent systems in biology. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2001, 16(6):14-20.
2. Galperin MY, Cochrane GR. Nucleic Acids Research annual Database Issue and the NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection in 2009. Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access Nucl Acids Res 2009, 37:D1-D4.
3. NCBI Entrez Global Search Portal. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/
4. The UniProt database. , http://www.uniprot.org/
5. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake J, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis A, Dolinski K, Dwight S, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese J, Richardson J, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000, 25:25-29.
6. Gruber TR. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1995, 43(5-6):907-928.
7. Bodenreider O, Stevens R. Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2006, 7(3):256-274. 1847325, 16899495.
8. The Open Biomedical Ontologies. , http://www.obofoundry.org/
9. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. 2001, Scientific American.
10. Resource Description Framework. , http://www.w3.org/RDF/
11. OWL Web Ontology Language. , http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
12. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. , http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
13. Semantic systems biology. , http://www.semantic-systems-biology.org/
14. Penkett C, Morris J, Wood V, Bähler J. Yogy: a web-based, integrated database to retrieve protein orthologs and associated gene ontology terms. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:W330-4. 1538793, 16845020.
15. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, Rao BS, Smirnov S, Sverdlov AV, Vasudevan S, Wolf YI, Yin JJ, Natale DA. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioninformatics 2003, 4:41.
16. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol. 2001, 314(5):1041-1052.
17. HomoloGene. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/homologene
18. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. Orthomcl-db: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34:D363-D368. 1347485, 16381887.
19. Goble C, Stevens R. State of the nation in data integration for bioinformatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2008, 41:687-693.
20. Pasquier C. Biological data integration using semantic web technologies. Biochimie 2008, 90(4):584-594.
21. BIOMart. , http://www.biomart.org/
22. Sahoo S, Bodenreider O, Zeng K, Sheth A. An experiment in integrating large biomedical knowledge resources with rdf: Application to associating genotype and phenotype information. Proceedings of the Workshop on Health Care and Life Sciences Data Integration for the Semantic Web, WWW2007: 8-12 May 2007; Banff, Canada
23. Zamboulis L, Martin N, Poulovassilis A. Bioinformatics service reconciliation by heterogeneous schema transformation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2007, 4544:89-104.
24. BIOMOBY. , http://www.biomoby.org/
25. The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. , http://protege.stanford.edu/
26. Jena Semantic Web Framework. , http://jena.sourceforge.net/
27. MYSQL. , http://www.mysql.com/
28. Pellet: The Open Source OWL DL Reasoner. , http://clarkparsia.com/pellet
29. OGO Portal. , http://miuras.inf.um.es:9080/OGO-1.0/
30. Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S. AmiGO Hub, Web Presence Working Group. AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:288-289. 2639003, 19033274.
31. Fernández-Breis JT, Martínez-Béjar R, Valencia-García R, Vivancos-Vicente PJ, García-Sánchez F. Towards Cooperative Frameworks for Modeling and Integrating Biological Processes Knowledge. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience 2007, 3(3):164-171.