Effect of several modes of irrigation and fertigation on artichoke crop

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 681, Issue , 2005, Pages 127-134

  Mansour, M ^a   Mougou, R ^a   Mougou, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CARTHAGE   (Tunisia)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL AGRONOMIQUE DE TUNISIE   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Artichoke; Fertigation; WUE

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449363314     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.681.12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Aggarweal, R. and Narda, N.K. 1992. Studies on quality comparison of furrow and drip irrigated tomatoes. J. Res. Punjab. Agric. Univ. 29 (4): 514-518.
2. Bogle, C.R., Hartz, T.K. and Nunez, C. 1989. Comparison of subsurface trickle and furrow irrigation on plastic-mulched and bare soil for tomato production. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114 (1):40-43.
3. Bucks, D.A., Erie, L.J. and French, O.R. 1974. Quantity and frequency of trickle and furrow irrigation for efficient cabbage production. Agronomy journal. 66: 53-57.
4. Foury, C. 1978. Quelques aspects de l'Histoire des variétés d'artichaut (Cynara scolymus L.) -journ. D'Agric. Trad. Bot. Appl.-15-1-26-49.
5. Foury C. 1980. Etude sur le développement et la mise à fleur de l'artichaut (Cynara scolymus L.) issu de boutures et de semis. Thèse de docteuringénieur. Université de Pierre et Marie Curie -Paris 6-162.
6. Posas, V.W., Tan, C.S. and Stone, J.A. 1987. Flooding stress and root Development of several tomato genotypes. Hort. Sc. 22(1):24-26.
7. Sammis, T.W. 1980. Comparison of sprinkler, trickle, subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crop. Agronomy journal.72(5): 701-704.
8. Satpute, G.U., Bendal, S.K. and Kausal, A.R. 1992. Water requirement of tomato crop under drip and furrow irrigation. PKV Res. J 16 (1).
9. Sweeny, D.W., Bottcher, A.B., Locascio, S.J. and Campbell, K.L. 1987. Tomato yield and nitrogen recovery as influenced by irrigation method, nitrogen source, and mulch. Hort. Science 22(1): 27-29