The validity of visual surrogates for representing waterscapes

Landscape Research

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 323-335

  Huang, Shu Chun Lucy ^a  

^a SHIH HSIN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Dynamic simulation; Environmental perception; Validity; Videos; Visual surrogate

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOGRAPHICAL THOUGHT; PERCEPTION; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 70449359923     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426390902867984     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, L. M., Mulligan, B. E., Goodman, L. S. & Regen, H. Z. (1983) Effects of sounds on preferences for outdoor settings, Environment and Behavior, 15(5), pp. 539-566.
2. Appleyard, D., Lynch, K. & Myer, J. R. (1964) The View from the Road (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
3. Berman, B. & Evans, J. R. (1995) Retail Management: A Strategic Approach (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
4. Bishop, I. D. & Hull, R. B. (1991) Integrating technologies for visual resource management, Journal of Environmental Management, 32, pp. 259-312.
5. Bishop, I. D. & Rohrmann, B. (1995) Visualization tools: their role in understanding human responses to the urban environment, in: R. Wyatt & H. Hossein (Eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning, pp. 313-322 (Melbourne: University of Melbourne).
6. Bishop, I. D. & Rohrmann, B. (2003) Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, pp. 261-277.
7. Bosselmann, P. & Craik, K. H. (1987) Perceptual simulation of environments, in: R. B. Bechtel, R. Marans & W. M. Michelson (Eds) Methods in Environmental and Behavioral Research, pp. 162-190 (New York: Van Nostrand).
8. Brodnax, J. (1983) The lively room: an effort to design for laughter in hospitals, Man-Environment Systems, 13(2), pp. 97-106.
9. Brown, T. C. & Daniel, T. C. (1989) Effect of changes in streamflow on scenic quality: The case of the Cache-La Poudre River, USDA Final Report A., USDA Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
10. Carles, J. L., Barrio, I. L. & Lucio, J. D. (1999) Sound influence on landscape values, Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, pp. 191-200.
11. Carles, J. L., Bernaldez, F. & Lucio, J. D. (1992) Audio-visual interations and scoundscape preferences, Landscape Research, 17(2), pp. 52-56.
12. Cotterll, J. L. (1991) The emergence of adolescent territories in a large urban leisure environment, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(1), pp. 25-41.
13. Daniel, T. C. (1992) Data visualization for decision support in environmental management, Landscape and Urban Planning, 24, pp. 149-163.
14. Daniel, T. C. & Boster, R. S. (1976) Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method, USDA Forest Service Research Paper, May, pp. 1-66.
15. Daniel, T. C. & Meitner, M. M. (2001) Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 61-72.
16. Garling, T. (1976) The structural analysis of environmental perception and cognition: a multidimensional scaling approach, Environment and Behavior, 8, pp. 385-415.
17. Gibson, J. (1977) The theory of affordances, in: R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward and Ecological Psychology, pp. 67-82 (Hillsdale, NJ: Halsted Press).
18. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).
19. Heft, H. & Nasar, J. L. (2000) Evaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus static displays, Environment and Behavior, 32, pp. 301-322.
20. Hetherington, J. (1991) Representing the environment: visual surrogates in environmental assessment, The Proceedings of EDRA 22, pp. 246-252.
21. Hetherington, J., Daniel, T. C. & Brown, T. C. (1993) Is motion more important than it sounds?: the medium of presentation in environment perception research, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(NV), pp. 283-291.
22. Heywood, J. L. (2002) The cognitive and emotional components of behavior norms in outdoor recreation, Leisure Science, 24, pp. 271-281.
23. Hoffman, R. E. (1997) Testing the validity and reliability of slides as representations of northern hardwood forest conditions, doctoral dissertation, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.
24. Huang, S.-C. L. (2004) An exploratory approach for using videos to represent dynamic environments, Landscape Research, 29(2), pp. 205-218.
25. Hull, R. B. & Revell, G. R. B. (1989) Issues in sampling landscape for visual quality assessments, Landscape and Urban Planning, 174, pp. 323-320.
26. Hull, R. B. & Stewart, W. P. (1992) Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, pp. 101-114.
27. Ittelson, W. (Ed.) (1973) Environment and Cognition (New York: Seminar Press).
28. Kaplan, S. (1988) Where cognition and affect meet: A theoretical analysis of preference, in: J. L. Nasar (Ed.) Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, & Applications, pp. 56-63 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
29. Machleit, A. & Eroglu, S. A. (2000) Describing and measuring emotional response to shopping experience, Journal of Business Research, 49, pp. 101-111.
30. Morgan, R. (1999) Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment, Landscape Research, 24(2), pp. 167-184.
31. Nassauer, J. I. (1982) Framing the landscape in photographic simulation, Journal of Environmental Management, 17, pp. 1-16.
32. Oh, K. (1994) A perceptual evaluation of computer-based landscape simulations, Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, pp. 201-216.
33. Orland, B. (1988) Video imaging: a powerful tool for visualization and analysis, Landscape Architecture, 78, pp. 78-88.
34. Palmer, J. F. & Hoffman, R. E. (2001) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, pp. 149-161.
35. Rohrmann, B. & Bishop, I. (2002) Subjective responses to computer simulations of urban environments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, pp. 319-331.
36. Russell, J. A., Ward, L. M. & Pratt, G. (1981) The affective quality attributed to environments, Environment and Behavior, 13, pp. 259-288.
37. Schafer, M. (1977) The Tuning of the World (Toronto, ON: The Canadian Publishers).
38. Shafer, E. L. J. & Richards, T. A. (1974) A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes, US Forest Service Research Paper NE-302, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Derby, PA.
39. Sheppard, S. R. J. (2001) Guidance for crystal ball gazers: Developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, pp. 183-199.
40. Shuttleworth, S. (1980) The use of photographs as an environment presentation medium in landscape studies, Journal of Environmental Management, 11, pp. 61-76.
41. Stamps, A. E. (1990) Use of photographs to simulate environments: a meta-analysis, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, pp. 907-913.
42. Stamps, A. E.(1993) Simulation effects on environmental preference, Journal of Environmental Management, 38, pp. 133-143.
43. Sutherland, I. E. (1970) Computer display, Scientific American, 222(6), pp. 57-81.
44. Thiel, P. (1970) Notes on the description, scaling, notation, and scoring of some perceptual and cognitive attributes of the physical environment, in: H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson & L. G. Rivlin (Eds) Environmental Psychology: Man in his Physical Setting (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).s
45. Thiel, P. (1997) People, Paths and Purposes (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press).
46. Ward, L. M. & Russell, J. A. (1981) The psychological representation of molar physical environments, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 110, pp. 121-152.
47. Wohlwill, J. F. (1976) Environmental aesthetics: the environment as a source of affect, in: I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Ed.) Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research (New York: Plenum Press).
48. Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G. & Anderson, T. W. (1975) Perception and prediction of scenic resource values in the North-East, in: E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush & J. Fabros (Eds) Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources, pp. 151-167 (Stroudsbury, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross).
49. Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E. & Charles, S. L. (1987) Perceptual landscape simulations: history and prospect, Landscape Journal, 6, pp. 62-80.