Deposition of aerially applied spray to a stream within a vegetative barrier

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1481-1490

  Thistle, H W ^a   Ice, G G ^b   Karsky, R L ^a   Hewitt, A J ^c   Dorr, G ^d  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b National Council of Air and Stream Improvement   (United States)

^c LINCOLN AGRITECH LTD   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aerial application; Drift; Forestry; Herbicide

Indexed keywords

AERIAL APPLICATION; ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS; CHEMICAL DEPOSITION; DRIFT; FIELD STUDIES; FOREST PRACTICES; LOW WIND SPEED; LOW WIND SPEED CONDITION; RIPARIAN BUFFERS; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; STREAM SURFACE; SUSPENDED DROPLETS; TOTAL MASS; WIND DIRECTIONS;

FORESTRY; TIMBER; VEGETATION; WEED CONTROL; WIND EFFECTS;

HERBICIDES;

ATMOSPHERE-HYDROSPHERE INTERACTION; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; FOLIAGE; FORESTRY PRACTICE; HERBICIDE; NATURAL ATTENUATION; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SUSPENDED LOAD; WIND DIRECTION; WIND VELOCITY;

DRIFT; FOLIAR ANALYSIS; FORESTRY; HERBICIDES; OREGON; WEED CONTROL;

CORVALLIS; NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70449348286     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bird, S. L., S. G. Perry, S. L. Ray, and M. E. Teske. 2002. Evaluation of the AGDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDrift model. Environ. Toxicology and Chem. 21(3): 672-681.
2. Boedinger, M. 2006. Ultraviolet fluorescence measurement of dye for dye studies. ASL SOP No. GEN 65.01. Corvallis, Ore.: CH2M Hill.
3. Bouvet, T., J. D. Wilson, and A. Tuzet. 2006. Observations and modeling of heavy particle deposition in a windbreak flow. J. Applied Meteorology and Climatology 45(9): 1332-1348.
4. Bouvet, T., B. Loubet, J. D. Wilson, and A. Tuzet. 2007. Filtering of windborne particles by a natural windbreak. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 123(3): 481-509.
5. Culvenor, D., D. L. B. Jupp, J. Lovell, and G. Newnham. 2005. Evaluation and validation of canopy laser radar systems for native and plantation forest inventory: Summary report. Project No. PN02.3902. Victoria, Australia: Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation.
6. Fritz, B. K. and W. C. Hoffmann. 2008. Development of a system for determining collection efficiency of spray samplers. Trans. ASABE 24(3): 285-293.
7. Hewitt, A. J., D. Johnson, J. D. Fish, C. G. Hermansky, and D. L. Valcore. 2002. The development of the spray drift task force database on pesticide movements for aerial agricultural spray applications. Environ. Toxicology and Chem. 21(3): 648-658.
8. Ice, G. 2005. Forest riparian protection in the Pacific Northwest. Western Forester 50(2): 8-10.
9. Jupp, D. L. B., D. S. Culvenor, J. L. Lovell, G. J. Newnham, A. H. Strahler, and C. E. Woodcock. 2009. Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground based lidar called 'ECHIDNA'. Tree Physiology 29(2): 171-181.
10. Miller, D. R., T. E. Stoughton, W. E. Steinke, E. W. Huddleston, and J. B. Ross. 2000. Atmospheric stability effects on pesticide drift from an irrigated orchard. Trans. ASAE 43(5): 1057-1066.
11. Pasquill F. 1974. Atmospheric Diffusion, New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Pasquill, F. 1974. Atmospheric Diffusion. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons. Raupach, M. R., N. Woods, G. Dorr, J. F. Leys, and H. A. Cleugh. 2001. The entrapment of particles by windbreaks. Atmos. Environ. 35(20): 3373-3383.
13. Richardson, B., and H. W. Thistle. 2006. Measured and predicted aerial spray interception by a young Pinus radiata canopy. Trans. ASABE 49(1): 15-23.
14. Salyani, M., M. Farooq, and R. D. Sweeb. 2007. Spray deposition and mass balance in citrus orchard applications. Trans. ASABE 50(6): 1963-1969.
15. Schou, W., H. Thistle, J. Strager, B. Richardson, D. Thompson, and D. Twardus. 2009. Approach to grouping flight lines in the Spray Advisor aerial spray simulation model. In Proc. 2009 Workshop SERG International. SERG-I. Available at: www.sergreport.net/.
16. Teske, M. E., and H. W. Thistle. 2004. A library of forest canopy structure for use in interception modeling. Forest Ecology and Mgmt. 198(3): 341-350.
17. Teske, M. E., G. G. Ice, and H. W. Thistle. July, 2002. The influence of riparian barrier on a forest stream. ASAE Paper No. 022047. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
18. Teske, M. E., H. W. Thistle, and G. G. Ice. 2003. Technical advances in modeling aerially applied sprays. Trans. ASAE 46(4): 985-996.
19. Teske, M. E., H. W. Thistle, and G. G. Ice. 2005. The role of a riparian barrier on drift mitigation. ASAE Paper No. 051150. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.
20. Thistle, H. W. 2000. The role of stability in fine pesticide droplet dispersion in the atmosphere: A review of physical concepts. Trans. ASAE 43(6): 1409-1413.
21. Thistle, H. W., H. Peterson, G. Allwine, B. Lamb, T. Strand, E. H. Holsten, and P. J. Shea. 2004. Surrogate pheromone plumes in three forest trunk spaces: Composite statistics and case studies. Forest Sci. 50(5): 610-625.
22. Thistle, H. W., D. G. Thompson, B. Richardson, S. L. Bird, and R. Karsky. 2008. Deposition of aerially released Bt over a 2 km sampling grid: Near-field model comparison. ASABE Paper No. 08124. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.
23. Tuzet, A., and J. D. Wilson. 2007. Measured winds about a thick hedge. Agric. and Forest Meteorology 145(3-4): 195-205.
24. Ucar, T., and F. R. Hall. 1999. Recent studies on pesticide spray drift reduction with artificial and natural barriers. in Proc. 7th Intl. Congress on Agric. Mechanization and Energy (ICAM '09), 42-49. Adana, Turkey.
25. Wang, H., and E. S. Takle. 1995. A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 75(1-2): 141-173.
26. Wang, H., and E. S. Takle. 1997. Momentum budget and shelter mechanism of boundary-layer flow near a shelterbelt. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 82(3): 417-435.
27. Wang, H., E. S. Takle, and J. Shen. 2001. Shelterbelts and windbreaks: Mathematical modeling and computer simulations of turbulent flows. Annual Review Fluid Mech. 33: 549-586.
28. Wilson, J. D. 2005. Deposition of particles to a thin windbreak: The effect of a gap. Atmos. Environ. 39(30): 5525-5531.
29. Zhu, H., R. C. Derksen, C. R. Krause, R. D. Fox, R. D. Brazee, and H. E. Ozkan. 2005. Effect of solution and pH conditions on fluorescence of spray deposition tracers. Applied Eng. in Agric. 21(3): 325-329.