Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 219-222

  Mirmohammadi, Hesam ^a   Kleverlaan, Cornelis J ^b   Feilzer, Albert J ^c  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b Department of Dental Materials Science ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

The results reveal the necessity for substantial preclinical evaluation of restorative materials in terms of fatigue mechanisms

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINFONY COMPOSITE RESIN; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; WATER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; ROTATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; PLIABILITY; POLYURETHANES; ROTATION; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 70449348212     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jokstad A, Gokce M, Hjortsjo C. A systematic review of the scientific documentation of fixed partial dentures made from fiber-reinforced polymer to replace missing teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:489-496.
2. Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of glass-fiber-reinforced crowns and fixed partial dentures: A three-year retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2003;34:493-496.
3. Scherrer SS, Wiskott AH, Coto-Hunziker V, Belser UC. Monotonic flexure and fatigue strength of composites for provisional and definitive restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:579-588.
4. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Fatigue resistance of soldered joints: A methodological study. Dent Mater 1994;10:215-220.
5. EN ISO 4049, Dentistry-polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. 1st ed. International Standard, 2000.
6. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1979;58:1093-1096.
7. Yap AU, Chandra SP, Chung SM, Lim CT. Changes in flexural properties of composite restoratives after aging in water. Oper Dent 2002;27:468-474.
8. Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber position and polymerization condition on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:14-26.
9. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 1994; 22:97-102.
10. Lohbauer U, von der Horst T, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent Mater 2003;19:435-440.
11. Shin MA, Drummond JL. Evaluation of chemical and mechanical properties of dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:540-545.
12. Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK. Flexural creep deformation and recovery in dental composites. J Dent 2001;29:545-551.
13. McCabe JF, Wang Y, Braem M. Surface contact fatigue and flexural fatigue of dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:375-380.
14. Harik VM, Klinger JR, Bogetti TA. Low-cycle fatigue of unidirectional composites: Bi-linear S-N curves. Int J Fatigue 2002;24:455-462.
15. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behavior of direct post-and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res 1992;71:1145-1150.
16. Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glassceramic material. Dent Mater 2008;24:39-44.