Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 2952-2966

  Lennox, Kristin P ^a   Sherman, Michael ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated proportions; McNemar's test; Nuisance parameter; Power; Transmission disequilibrium test

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE 3 RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; BINARY MATCHED PAIR DATA; CALCULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENETIC LINKAGE; HYPNOSIS; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MCNEMAR TEST; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PAIN; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL POWER; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSMISSION DISEQUILIBRIUM TEST;

ALGORITHMS; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; BIOSTATISTICS; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEOPLASMS; PAIN; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D3; SAMPLE SIZE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 70449338025     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3683     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. Transmission test for linkage disequilibirum: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). American Journal of Human Genetics 1993; 52:506-516. (Pubitemid 23311321)
2. 3 receptor gene-expressed variant and schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1996; 67:232-234.
3. Berger RL, Sidik K. Exact unconditional tests for a 2x2 matched-pairs design. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2003; 12(2):91-108. (Pubitemid 36347829)
4. Lloyd CJ. A new exact and more powerful unconditional test of no treatment effect from binary matched pairs. Biometrics 2008; 64:716-723.
5. May WL, Johnson WD. The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:1081-1096.
6. Suissa S, Shuster JJ. The 2x2 matched-pairs trial: exact unconditional design and analysis. Biometrics 1985; 47:361-372.
7. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947; 12:153-157.
8. Miettinen OS. The matched pairs design in the case of all-or-none responses. Biometrics 1968; 24:339-352.
9. Duffy SW. Asymptotic and exact power for the McNemar test and its analogue with r controls per case. Biometrics 1984; 40:1005-1015.
10. Bennett BM, Underwood RE. On McNemar's test for the 2x2 table and its power function. Biometrics 1970; 26:339-343.
11. Connor RJ. Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design. Biometrics 1987; 43:207-211.
12. Lachin JM. Power and sample size evaluation for the McNemar test with application to matched case-control studies. Statistics in Medicine 1992; 11:1239-1251.
13. Edwards AL. Note on the 'correction for continuity' in testing the significance of the difference between correlated proportions. Psychometrika 1948; 13:185-187.
14. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1975.
15. Cox DR. Two further applications of a model for binary regression. Biometrika 1958; 45:562-565.
16. Agresti A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley: New York, 1996.
17. Lancaster HO. Significance tests in discrete distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1961; 56:223-234.
18. Frisen M. Consequences of the use of conditional inference in the analysis of a correlated contingency table. Biometrika 1980; 67:23-30. (Pubitemid 10111069)