Prediction of shoulder dystocia combining foetal weight estimation by ultrasound and maternal risk factors A solution for the dilemma?;Prädiktion der schulterdystokie ist eine verbesserung der sonografischen detektion einer fetalen makrosomie unter hinzuziehung maternaler risikofaktoren möglich?

Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie

Volumn 213, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 180-185

  Stein, W ^a   Delfy, A ^b   Schmidt, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adipositas; Foetal macrosomia; Shoulder dystocia; Sonographic foetal weight estimation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBESITY; PARAMETER; PREDICTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BIRTH INJURIES; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL WEIGHT; GERMANY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 70449337943     PISSN: 09482393     EISSN: 14391651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1225643     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 179 476-480
2. Lewis DF, Edwards MS, Asrat T, et al. Can shoulder dystocia be predicted? Preconceptual and prenatal factors. J Reprod Med 1998 43 654-658
3. Lurie S, Levy R, Ben-Arie A, et al. Shoulder dystocia: could it be deduced from the labor partogram? Am J Perinatology 1995 12 61-62
4. McFarland MB, Langer O, Piper JM, et al. Perinatal outcome and the type and number of maneuvers in shoulder dystocia. Internat J Gynecol Obstet 1996 55 219-224
5. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998 178 1126-1130
6. Kees S, Margalit V, Schiff E, et al. Features of shoulder dystocia in a busy obstetric unit. J Reprod Med 2001 46 583-588
7. Berle P, Misselwitz B, Scharlau J. Maternal risks for newborn macrosomia, incidence of a shoulder dystocia and of damages of the plexus brachialis. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2003 207 148-152
8. Schwenzer T. Shoulder dystocia and forensic aspects. Gynakologe 1994 27 222-228
9. Krause M, Feige A. Shoulder dystocia from a legal standpoint. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2005 209 201-209
10. Gregory KD, Henry OA, Ramicone E, et al. Maternal and infant complication in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998 92 507-513
11. Gherman RB. Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetrical nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002 45 345-361
12. Seibre NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001 1175-1182
13. Bowers D, Cohen WR. Obesity and related pregnancy complications in an inner-city clinic. J Perinatol 1999 19 216-219
14. Steinfeld JD, Valentine S, Lerer T, et al. Obesity-related complications of pregnancy vary by race. J Matern Fetal Med 2000 9 238-241
15. Gross TL, Sokol RJ, Williams T, et al. Shoulder dystocia: a fetal-physician risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987 156 1408-1418
16. Ocer F, Kaleli S, Budak E, et al. Fetal weight estimation and prediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999 83 47-52
17. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol 2002 100 1045-1050
18. Jayazeri A, Heffron JA, Phillips R, et al. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more. Obstet Gynecol 1999 93 523-526
19. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004 17; 329 168-169
20. Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FD. Sonographically estimated fetal weights: Accuracy and limitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988 159 1118-1121
21. Pollack RN, Hauer-Pollack G, Divon MY. Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: The accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992 167 7-11
22. Pressman EK, Bienstock JL, Blakemore KJ, et al. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in the third trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2000 95 502-506
23. Predanic M, Cho A, Ingrid F, et al. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: acquiring accuracy in residency. J Ultrasound Med 2002 21 495-500
24. Chauhan SP, Sullivan CA, Lutton TC, et al. Parous patients estimate of birth weight in postterm regnancy. J Perinatol 1995 15 192-194
25. Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. The Green Bay cesarean section study: IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 174 1557-1564
26. Spellacy WN, Miller MS, Winegar A, et al. Macrosomiad maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985 66 158-162
27. Bahar AM. Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight. BJOG 1996 103 868-872
28. Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB. Shoulder dystocia: are historic risk factors reliable predictors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 192 1933-1938
29. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, et al. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 195 657-672
30. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984 150 535-540
31. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG) Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medizinrecht (AG MedR). Empfehlungen zur Schulterdystokie Erkennung, Prävention und Management überarbeitung 2008 Entwicklungsstufe 1. AWMF Leitlinienregister 015/024