Mechanical characterization of an innovative dental implant system

Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Biomechanics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 23-28

  Diamanti, Maria Vittoria ^a   Del Curto, Barbara ^a   Barlattani, Alberto ^b   Bollero, Patrizio ^b   Ottria, Liliana ^b   Pedeferri, Mariapia ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Mechanical resistance; Roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BENDING; COMPRESSION; FATIGUE TEST; MATERIAL STATE; MECHANICAL STRENGTH; PHYSICAL RESISTANCE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORGUE;

EID: 70449337362     PISSN: 17226899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 76-94.
2. Schweizer CM, Schlegel KA, Rudzki-Janson I. Endosseous dental implants in orthodontic therapy. Int Dent J 1996; 46: 61-8.
3. Zonfrillo G, Pratesi F. Mechanical strength of dental implants. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2008; 6: 110-8.
4. Visai L, Rimondini L, Giordano C, et al. Electrochemical surface modification of titanium for implant abutments can affect oral bacteria contamination. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2008; 6: 170-7.
5. Draghi L, Cigada A. Nanostructured surfaces for biomedical applications. Part I: nanotopography. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2007; 5: 61-9.
6. Forsgren J, Svahn F, Jarmar T, Engqvist H. Structural change of biomimetic hydroxyapatite coatings due to heat treatment. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2007; 5: 23-7.
7. Giordano C, Pedeferri MP, Olivero P, et al. In-vitro study of a new treatment for controlling bacterial adhesion to titanium and titanium-alloy dental implants. In: XXV Conferenza Nazionale di Citometria Abstracts. Cytometry A 2008; 73: 48-108.
8. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 422-31.
9. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 9-17.
10. Luongo R, Traini T, Guidone PC, Bianco G, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 551-7.
11. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 197-212.
12. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurements between sessions in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 681-6.
13. Brunski, BJ. In vivo bone response to biomedical loading at the bone/ dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 99-119.
14. Dentistry - implants - dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants. ISO 14801.
15. Implants for surgery - Metallic materials. ISO 5832.