Understanding totally asymmetric simple-exclusion-process transport on networks: Generic analysis via effective rates and explicit vertices

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Embley, Ben ^a   Parmeggiani, Andrea ^b   Kern, Norbert ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ MONTPELLIER 2   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERIC ANALYSIS; MEAN-FIELD; PARTICLE DENSITIES; PARTICLE-HOLE SYMMETRY; PROCESS SEGMENT; SIMPLE NETWORKS; SIMPLE-EXCLUSION PROCESS; SIMULATION DATA; SINGLE SEGMENTS; TRANSPORT PROCESS;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 70449125658     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041128     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. C. T. MacDonald, J. H. Gibbs, and A. C. Pipkin, Biopolymers 6, 1 (1968). 10.1002/bip.1968.360060102
2. C. T. MacDonald and J. H. Gibbs, Biopolymers 7, 707 (1969). 10.1002/bip.1969.360070508
3. Q.-H. Wei, C. Bechinger, and P. Leiderer, Science 287, 625 (2000). 10.1126/science.287.5453.625
4. A. Schadschneider, Physica A 285, 101 (2000). 10.1016/S0378-4371(00) 00274-0
5. C. Lutz, M. Kollmann, P. Leiderer, and C. Bechinger, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S4075 (2004). 10.1088/0953-8984/16/38/022
6. A. Basu and D. Chowdhury, Am. J. Phys. 75, 931 (2007). 10.1119/1.2757628
7. D. Helbing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067 (2001). 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1067
8. V. Belitsky, N. Marić, and G. M. Schütz, J. Phys. A 40, 11221 (2007). 10.1088/1751-8113/40/37/002
9. E. Frey, A. Parmeggiani, and T. Franosch, Genome Informatics 15, 46 (2004).
10. S. Klumpp, T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, and R. Lipowsky, Physica E (Amsterdam) 29, 380 (2005). 10.1016/j.physe.2005.05.037
11. D. Chowdhury, A. Schadschneider, and K. Nishinari, Phys. Life. Rev. 2, 318 (2005). 10.1016/j.plrev.2005.09.001
12. A. Roux, G. Cappello, J. Cartaud, J. Prost, B. Goud, and P. Bassereau, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5394 (2002). 10.1073/pnas.082107299
13. G. Koster, M. VanDuijn, B. Hofs, and M. Dogterom, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 15583 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.2531786100
14. C. Leduc, O. Campas, K. B. Zeldovich, A. Roux, P. Jolimaitre, L. Bourel-Bonnet, and B. Goud, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17096 (2004). 10.1073/pnas.0406598101
15. J. Brankov, N. Pesheva, and N. Bunzarova, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066128 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066128
16. E. Pronina and A. B. Kolomeisky, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2005, P07010. 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/07/P07010
17. R. Wang, M. Liu, and R. Jiang, Phys. Rev. E 77, 051108 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051108
18. B. Embley, A. Parmeggiani, and N. Kern, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 295213 (2008). 10.1088/0953-8984/20/29/295213
19. W. Thomson, Philos. Mag. 24, 503 (1887).
20. The Kelvin Problem: Foam Structures of Minimal Surface Area, edited by, D. Weaire, (Taylor & Francis, London, 1997).
21. H. T. Lee, S. J. Neethling, and J. J. Cilliers, Colloids Surf., A 263, 320 (2005). 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.064
22. P. Pal, C. S. O'Hern, J. Blawzdziewicz, E. R. Dufresne, and R. Stinchcombe, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011111 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011111
23. M. E. Foulaadvand and M. Neek-Amal, EPL 80, 60002 (2007). 10.1209/0295-5075/80/60002
24. S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. A 45, 618 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.618
25. S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 77, 35 (1994). 10.1007/BF02186831
26. A. B. Kolomeisky, J. Phys. A 31, 1153 (1998). 10.1088/0305-4470/31/4/006
27. J. Krug, Braz. J. Phys. 30, 97 (2000). 10.1590/S0103-97332000000100009
28. R. B. Stinchcombe, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 1473 (2002). 10.1088/0953-8984/14/7/306
29. L. B. Shaw, A. B. Kolomeisky, and K. H. Lee, J. Phys. A 37, 2105 (2004). 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/010
30. P. Pierobon, M. Mobilia, R. Kouyos, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. E 74, 031906 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.031906
31. P. Greulich and A. Schadschneider, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008, P04009. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/04/P04009
32. P. Greulich and A. Schadschneider, Physica A 387, 1972 (2008). 10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.037
33. We use the term "mean field" throughout the paper, although there are various subtle points one should keep in mind that current and bulk density are proper mean-field quantities (for which, on the other hand, the mean-field expressions are known to be exact), but density profiles are not; in order to reconstruct density profiles one must invoke a domain wall theory on top of mean-field results, which retains collective fluctuations (shock fluctuations) in a phenomenological manner.
34. A. B. Kolomeisky, G. M. Schütz, E. B. Kolomeisky, and J. P. Straley, J. Phys. A 31, 6911 (1998). 10.1088/0305-4470/31/33/003
35. B. Derrida, E. Domany, and D. Mukamel, J. Stat. Phys. 69, 667 (1992). 10.1007/BF01050430
36. G. Schütz and E. Domany, J. Stat. Phys. 72, 277 (1993). 10.1007/BF01048050
37. B. Derrida, M. R. Evans, V. Hakim, and V. Pasquier, J. Phys. A 26, 1493 (1993). 10.1088/0305-4470/26/7/011
38. B. Derrida, S. A. Janowsky, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer, J. Stat. Phys. 73, 813 (1993). 10.1007/BF01052811
39. K. Mallick, S. Mallick, and N. Rajewsky, J. Phys. A 32, 8399 (1999). 10.1088/0305-4470/32/48/303
40. G. M. Schütz, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Academic Press, London, 2000), Vol. 19.
41. B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 030601 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.030601
42. C. Enaud and B. Derrida, J. Stat. Phys. 114, 537 (2004). 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000012501.43746.cf
43. B. Derrida, C. Enaud, and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 115, 365 (2004). 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000019833.35328.b4
44. C. Boldrighini, G. Cosimi, S. Frigio, and M. Grasso Nuñes, J. Stat. Phys. 55, 611 (1989). 10.1007/BF01041600
45. B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer, J. Stat. Phys. 89, 135 (1997). 10.1007/BF02770758
46. P. A. Ferrari and L. P. R. Pimentel, Ann. Probab. 33, 1235 (2005). 10.1214/009117905000000080
47. L. Santen and C. Appert, J. Stat. Phys. 106, 187 (2002). 10.1023/A:1013176229983
48. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension, edited by, V. Privman, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
49. G. M. Schütz, Diffus. Fundam. 2, 5.1 (2005).
50. P. Pierobon, A. Parmeggiani, F. von Oppen, and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. E 72, 036123 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.036123
51. J. Krug, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1882 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1882
52. J. S. Hager, J. Krug, V. Popkov, and G. M. Schütz, Phys. Rev. E 63, 056110 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056110
53. This is formally closer to previous work except that introducing the extra junction site makes our approach entirely systematic and that inaccessible subcases may be discarded very easily based on effective-rate arguments. Note also that our approach (as well as our results) furthermore differs significantly from those for a V (1:m) with a synchronous update scheme.
54. We do point out, however, that the analogous interpretation for a periodic-on-average but open system constructed from a V(2:2) requires further care: a full understanding of domain wall dynamics is required in this case, which cannot be achieved within the present framework since working with effective rates deduced from the average junction density necessarily neglects all correlation effects. For reasons of space and focus, we reserve this discussion for elsewhere.
55. H. Hinsch and E. Frey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 095701 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.095701
56. For completeness, however, we note that a (MC □ LD) phase does arise for a system consisting of two parallel sections, but it is effectively ruled out here through the condition of periodicity on average.