Recruitment and training of a sensory expert panel to measure the touch of beverage packages: Issue and methods employed

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 156-164

  Lefebvre, A ^a   Bassereau, J F ^a   Pense Lheritier A M ^b   Rivere C ^c   Harris, N ^d   Duchamp, R ^a  

^a Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation   (France)

^b Ecole de Biologie Industrielle   (France)

^c EA 1753   (France)

^d SAINT GOBAIN RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

Beverage packages; Hand movements; Sensory panel; Tactile perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449122136     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barthélémy J. Evaluation d'une grandeur sensorielle complexe: Description quantifiée. SSHA, Evaluation sensorielle, manuel méthodologique. 2nd ed. (1998), TEC&DOC, Lavoisier 149-169
2. Bassereau J.F. Le petit livre du Toucher et d'autres sensations pour découvrir notre appareil descriptif et le monde qui nous entoure (2001), ENSAM, Paris
3. Bouyssou J., and Bassereau J.F. Conception d'un outil de communication sur les aspects perçus du cuir pour la société Cartier. Proceedings of the 5th CONFERE seminar, France (1998), Library of the Ecole Nationale d'Arts et Métiers, Paris
4. Cardello A.V., Winterhalter C., and Schutz H. Predicting the handle and comfort of military clothing fabrics from sensory and instrumental data: Development and application of new psychophysical methods. Textile Research Journal 73 3 (2003) 221-237
5. Civille G.V., and Dus C.A. Development of terminology to describe the handfeel properties of paper and fabrics. Journal of Sensory Studies 5 (1990) 19-32
6. ®. Proceedings of the 5th pangborn sensory science symposium (2003), Elsevier, Boston (USA), Oxford (UK)
7. Davidson P.W. Haptic judgments of curvature by blind and sighted humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1972) 43-55
8. Davidson P.W., and Whitson T.T. Haptic equivalence matching of curvature by blind and sighted humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1974) 687-690
9. Gallace A., and Spence C. Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research 162 (2005) 490-496
10. Giboreau A., Navarro S., Faye P., and Dumortier J. Sensory evaluation of automotive fabrics: The contribution of categorization tasks and non verbal information to set-up a descriptive method of tactile properties. Food Quality and Preference 12 (2001) 311-322
11. Griffiths P., and Kulke T. Clothing movement - Visual sensory evaluation and its correlation to fabric properties. Journal of Sensory Studies 17 (2002) 229-255
12. Hollins M., and Risner S.R. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Perception and Psychophysics 62 4 (2000) 695-705
13. ISO 13299 (2003). Sensory analysis - Methodology-general guidance for establishing a sensory profile.
14. ISO 8586-1 (1993). Sensory analysis - General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors-Part 1: Selected assessors.
15. Jacobsson A., Nielsen T., Sjöholm I., and Wendin K. Influence of packaging material and storage condition on the sensory quality of broccoli. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 301-310
16. Katz D. The world of touch (Original work published in 1925) translated by Kreuger, L.E. (1989), Hillsdale, Laurence Erlbaum Associates
17. Lange C., Issanchou S., and Combris P. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000) 289-297
18. Lederman S.J., and Klatzky R.L. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19 3 (1987) 342-368
19. Leplat J. L'analyse psychologique de l'activité en ergonomie. Aperçu sur son évolution, ses modèles et ses méthodes (2004), Octarès Editions, Toulouse
20. Meilgaard M., Civille G.V., and Carr T. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed. (p. 146) (1999), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
21. Meingast, M. (2001). Increasing attention and retention of warnings: Effect of container hazardousness, warning quality, and severity of injury. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 45th annual meeting.
22. Montet A. Les principales méthodes descriptives et leurs variantes. Traité d'évaluation sensorielle, aspects cognitifs et métrologies des perceptions (2001), DUNOD 45-60
23. Mottet G. La vidéo-formation. Autres regards, autres pratiques (1997), L'Harmattan, Paris
24. Murray J.M., and Delahunty C.M. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of cheddar cheese. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000) 419-435
25. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M., and Baxter I.A. Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Research International 34 (2001) 461-471
26. Nicod H. L'organisation pratique de la mesure sensorielle, l'entraînement. SSHA, Evaluation sensorielle. Manuel méthodologique. 2nd ed. (1998), TEC&DOC, Lavoisier 53-58
27. Serig E.M. The influence of container shape and color cues on consumer product risk perception and precautionary intent. Proceedings of the IAE/HFSE Congress 2000 (2000), Human Factor and Ergonomics Society, USA
28. Sieffermann J.M. L'organisation pratique de la mesure sensorielle. SSHA, Evaluation sensorielle. Manuel méthodologique. 2nd ed. (1995), TEC&DOC, Lavoisier 61-62
29. Spieholz P., Silverstein B., Morgan M., Checkoway H., and Kaufman J. Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44 (2001) 588-613
30. Urdapiletta I. Mise au point d'une liste de descripteurs par décision de groupe. Traité d'évaluation sensorielle, aspects cognitifs et métrologies des perceptions (2001), DUNOD, Paris 91-106
31. Wogalter, M. S., Laughery, K. R., & Barfield, D. A. (1997). Effect of container shape on hazard perceptions. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 41st annual meeting.
32. Woodward K.L. The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans. Somatosensory and Motor Research 10 1 (1993) 63-67