Accurate simulation dynamics of microscopic filaments using "caterpillar" Oseen hydrodynamics

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Bailey, A G ^a   Lowe, C P ^b   Pagonabarraga, I ^c   Lagomarsino, M Cosentino ^d,e  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^e INFN SEZIONE DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC THEORY; CROSS SECTION; EQUAL INTERVALS; EXPLICIT SURFACE; FLUID MOTIONS; HYDRODYNAMIC BEHAVIOR; HYDRODYNAMIC RADIUS; SPECIFIC VALUES; VISCOUS FLUIDS;

DEFORMATION; FILAMENTS (LAMP); HYDRODYNAMICS; SIMULATORS;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 70449120347     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046707     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. E. M. Purcell, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977). 10.1119/1.10903
2. C. Brennen and H. Winet, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 339 (1977). 10.1146/annurev.fl.09.010177.002011
3. G. J. Hancock, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 217, 96 (1953). 10.1098/rspa.1953.0048
4. D. Smith, E. Gaffney, and J. Blake, Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1477 (2007). 10.1007/s11538-006-9172-y
5. R. Dreyfus, J. Baudry, M. Roper, M. Fermigier, H. Stone, and J. Bibette, Nature (London) 437, 862 (2005). 10.1038/nature04090
6. M. van den Heuvel, M. de Graaff, S. Lemay, and C. Dekker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 7770 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0608316104
7. M. G. L. van den Heuvel, R. Bondesan, M. Cosentino Lagomarsino, and C. Dekker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 118301 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.118301
8. C. P. Lowe, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 358, 1543 (2003). 10.1098/rstb.2003.1340
9. G. P. Alexander, C. M. Pooley, and J. M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. E 78, 045302 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.045302
10. I. Llopis, I. Pagonabarraga, M. Cosentino Lagomarsino, and C. P. Lowe, Phys. Rev. E 76, 061901 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061901
11. J. Gray and G. J. Hancock, J. Exp. Biol. 32, 802 (1955).
12. M. Cosentino Lagomarsino, I. Pagonabarraga, and C. P. Lowe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 148104 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.148104
13. X. Xu and A. Nadim, Phys. Fluids 6, 2889 (1994). 10.1063/1.868116
14. M. J. Shelley and T. Ueda, Physica D 146, 221 (2000). 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00131-7
15. Y. W. Kim and R. R. Netz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 158101 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.158101
16. X. Schlagberger and R. R. Netz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 128301 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.128301
17. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1986).
18. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, 1986).
19. O. Kratky and G. Porod, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 68, 1106 (1949).
20. M. Fixman and J. Kovac, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1564 (1973). 10.1063/1.1679396
21. S. B. Smith, L. Finzi, and C. Bustamante, Science 258, 1122 (1992). 10.1126/science.1439819
22. J. Marko and E. Siggia, Macromolecules 28, 8759 (1995). 10.1021/ma00130a008
23. J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327 (1977). 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
24. A. G. Bailey, C. P. Lowe, and A. P. Sutton, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 8949 (2008). 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.07.002
25. W. C. Swope, H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens, and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 637 (1982). 10.1063/1.442716
26. M. Tuckerman, B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1990 (1992). 10.1063/1.463137
27. G. Kalibaeva, M. Ferrario, and G. Ciccotti, Mol. Phys. 101, 765 (2003). 10.1080/0026897021000044025
28. R. Argentini, Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2008.
29. C. P. Lowe, FGCS, Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 17, 853 (2001). 10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00063-7
30. R. G. Cox, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791 (1970). 10.1017/S002211207000215X
31. G. K. Batchelor, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419 (1970). 10.1017/S002211207000191X
32. P. K. Tillett, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401 (1970). 10.1017/S0022112070001908
33. Alternatively, for a given bead spacing b, we can dictate the aspect ratio by introducing a scaling factor δ and by using the more general equations r/b=δβ, a /b=4/ { 3 [2ln (2/δ) +1] }, and a/b=2/ { 3 [2ln (2/δ) -1] }. Solutions exist for δ<1.21. This corresponds to the condition that r/b must be less than 0.681. This is a useful result in that for a specified bead number, one can simulate a filament of a given slenderness at an equivalent computational expense.
34. J. B. Keller and S. I. Rubinow, J. Fluid Mech. 75, 705 (1976). 10.1017/S0022112076000475
35. We are grateful to Professor A. Nadim for pointing this out to us.
36. M. Tirado, C. Martinez, and J. de la Torre, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 2047 (1984). 10.1063/1.447827
37. The resultant parametrization is a /b=2/ [3 (-ln2+0.839+0.185/p+0.233/ p2 +1)] and a/b=1/ [3 (-ln2-0.207+0.980/p-0.133/ p2 +1)] with r/b=β, where L/d=p for the parametrization.
38. J. Rotne and S. Prager, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 4831 (1969). 10.1063/1.1670977
39. We calculated the parametrization to match slender body theory using the RP tensor to be a /b ≈ 0.559 and a /b ≈ 0.441, with r/b 0.437.