Model based analysis and test generation for flight software

Proceedings - 2009 3rd IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology, SMC-IT 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 83-90

  Pǎsǎreanu, Corina S ^a   Schumann, Johann ^a   Mehlitz, Peter ^a   Lowry, Mike ^a   Karsai, Gabor ^b   Nine, Harmon ^b   Neema, Sandeep ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODE GENERATION TOOLS; FLIGHT MISSION; FLIGHT SOFTWARE; INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS; MODEL ANALYSIS; MODEL BASED DEVELOPMENT; MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS; MODELING FORMALISMS; SOFTWARE MODEL; SYMBOLIC EXECUTION; TEST CASE GENERATION; TEST GENERATIONS; UML 2.0;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NASA; SPACE FLIGHT;

MODEL CHECKING;

EID: 70449118128     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SMC-IT.2009.19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. M. Atlee and J. Gannon. State-based model checking of event-driven systems requirements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(1):24-40, 1993.
2. Kennedy Carter. http://www.kc.com.
3. Choco Constraint Solver. http://choco.sourceforge.net.
4. C. Colby, P. Lee, G. C. Necula, F. Blau, M. Plesko, and K. Cline. A certifying compiler for Java. In Proc. PLDI 2000, pp 95-107, 2000. ACM Press.
5. E. Denney and S. Trac. A software safety certification tool for automatically generated guidance, navigation and control code. In IEEE Aerospace, 2008. IEEE.
6. Java Path Finder. http://javapathfinder.sourceforge.org.
7. G. Hamon and J. Rushby. An operational semantics for Stateflow. In Proc. 7th FASE, vol 2984 LNCS, pp 229-243, 2004. Springer.
8. D. Harel and A. Naamad. The Statemate Semantics of Statecharts. ACM TOSEM, 5(4):293-333, 1996.
9. R. Heckel. Graph transformation in a nutshell. In Language Engineering for Model-Driven Software Development, number 04101 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, 2005. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/16.
10. G. Karsai, A. Ledeczi, S. Neema, and J. Sztipanovits. The model-integrated computing toolsuite: Metaprogrammable tools for embedded control system design. In 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control Systems Design, pp 50-55, 2006.
11. G. Karsai, J. Sztipanovits, A. Ledeczi, and T. Bapty. Modelintegrated development of embedded software. In Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 91, pp 145-164, 2003.
12. J. C. King. Symbolic execution and program testing. Commun. ACM, 19(7):385-394, 1976.
13. Control algorithm modeling guidelines using Matlab, Simulink, and Stateflow - Version 2.0. Mathworks Automotive Advisory Board. http://www.mathworks.com/industries/auto/maab.html.
14. P. Mehlitz. Trust your model - verifying aerospace system models with Java pathfinder. In Proc IEEE Aerospace, 2008.
15. Guidelines for the use of the C language in critical systems. The Motor Industry Software Reliability Association. http://www.misra.org.uk/.
16. A. Narayanan and G. Karsai. Using semantic anchoring to verify behavior preservation in graph transformations. Electronic Communications of the EASST: Graph and Model Transformation 2006, 4, 2006.
17. C. S. Pasareanu, P. C. Mehlitz, D. H. Bushnell, K. Gundy- Burlet, M. Lowry, S. Person, and M. Pape. Combining unitlevel symbolic execution and system-level concrete execution for testing NASA software. In Proc. ISSTA'08 (to appear), 2008.
18. M. Pezzè and M. Young. Constructing multi-formalism statespace analysis tools. In Proc. ICSE, pp 239-249. ACM Press, 1997.